Talk:Arihant (Jainism)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by No such user in topic Requested move 8 July 2016
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Arihant (Jainism) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 8 July 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved per convincing counter-argument by Amakuru. No such user (talk) 14:08, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
No other page has title "Arihant" -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 09:07, 8 July 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. Eventhorizon51 (talk) 14:10, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support —Nimit (talk) 05:21, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - the primary topic for Arihant is certainly not this. From common usage, and page views,[1] we see that either the Arihant-class submarine (37k views in a month), or the INS Arihant (25k views in a month) easily beat this page which has 6k views in a month. Retaining the Dab page seems to be best. — Amakuru (talk) 09:46, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- U might have confused "INS" Arihant for Arihant. Both the titles you mentioned are incomplete without prefix/suffix. They are Primary topic for Arihant submarine or INs Arihant not for the word "Arihant". -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 10:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, but that's not how it works - a topic may be primary for a certain term even when the article isn't actually titled that way. This would be a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. My point is that when someone says "Arihant", unqualified, they're still more likely to be referring to the submarine than the Jainism. [2] refers to it simply as "Arihant". — Amakuru (talk) 10:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- U might have confused "INS" Arihant for Arihant. Both the titles you mentioned are incomplete without prefix/suffix. They are Primary topic for Arihant submarine or INs Arihant not for the word "Arihant". -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 10:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.