Talk:Arirang (1926 film)

Diacritics

Why are the wrong diacritics being used, as in Yônghûi? Badagnani (talk) 20:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Wouldn't know. Feel free to fix them, or I'll do it later. This article really should be brought up to GA or FA status eventually. Dekkappai (talk) 20:49, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Occupation vs. colonial rule

• I think that we should not use here expressions like "Japanese-occupied Korea" for following reasons:

1) Korea was not occupied, but annexed by the Empire of Japan and this annexation was recognized by the international community. 2) The article about colonial Korea is Korea under Japanese rule, not "Korea under Japanese occupation". 3) The term "occupation" implies that it was illegitimate, while the term "colonial rule" implies nothing. Elmor (talk) 08:30, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

All of unequal treaty between Japan and Korea was declared null and void by Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea. If these treaties were legitimate, involved countries was not conclude the treaty. The article about colonial Korea is translated words from Japanese point. Is it take a neutral attitude you think? --Historiographer (talk) 10:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Frankly, I failed to understand your point if view. Yes, the unequal treaties were officially nullified by the 1965 agreement, but that does not make them illegitimate. Also, as far as I know, official Japanese propaganda described the annexation as "merging", so "colonial rule" seems to be neutral between these two points of view. Could you please explain why do you object this term? I saw Korean publication using the term "식민지 시대" (colonial period) and nobody blamed their authors for being pro-Japanese. Elmor (talk) 16:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

However, almost media, books, and public in Korea usually using the term "Occupation" rather than "Colonial period".--Historiographer (talk) 03:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

1) You mean "일제강점기"? True, but, AFAIK, even in Korea the most common term is "Japanese Imperial Period" ("일제시대") (Google shows 1,170,000 results for 일제강점기 and 5,420,000 for 일제시대). 2) Back to the topic, do you consider the term "colonial period" to be pro-Japanese? Elmor (talk) 07:39, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Arirang (1926 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060204190739/http://english.chosun.com:80/w21data/html/news/200502/200502110014.html to http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200502/200502110014.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Arirang (1926 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200502/200502110014.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060204190739/http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200502/200502110014.html to http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200502/200502110014.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060215072341/http://english.yna.co.kr:80/ to http://english.yna.co.kr/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:51, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Arirang (1926 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927020845/http://www.koreafilm.org/english/db_detail_eng.asp?p_dataid=00033 to http://www.koreafilm.org/english/db_detail_eng.asp?p_dataid=00033
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071008183945/http://english.yna.co.kr/Engnews/20050222/300900000020050222105347E6.html to http://english.yna.co.kr/Engnews/20050222/300900000020050222105347E6.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://english.yna.co.kr/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:28, 9 July 2017 (UTC)