Talk:Arizona Rangers

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Zanski in topic Needs rewrite, possible split

Fallen officers

edit

In this section, a fallen officer is listed as having died in 1992 while escorting a man to an ATM. lolwut68.96.52.71 (talk) 00:26, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Leadership

edit

Is it certain Mooseman was a manager? Accordng too Mach Hughes father Pat Hughes who worked for the Hashknife Cattle Co. Mooseman was brought in as a Range Detective too deal with the cattle russling. He was with the Aztek Co. only 2 years before it belly´d up and was bought up by the Babbit Brothers of Flagstaff Az. Ryttar 21 April 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryttar (talkcontribs) 16:28, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Clint Eastwood, the protagonist of Coogan's Bluff, is a (mythical) modern Arizona Ranger. Georgejdorner (talk) 20:38, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Needs rewrite, possible split

edit

This is basically advertising for the "Arizona Rangers" 501c which, as the articles admit, started decades after the Arizona Rangers were disbanded. The information about the real Arizona Rangers should exist on Wikipedia without the distraction of this possibly non-notable organization. This article Arizona_Rangers should be about the historical Arizona Rangers and no more than a section should be about this new mall cop organization. If more is needed it should be put on a separate page. --SoyBenjamin (talk) 22:58, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I agree that the article needs to be rewritten and the original law enforcement agency needs to be distinguished from the modern organization. Unfortunately, a lot of literature on the subject conflates the two. However, there are similar unofficial auxiliaries with articles on Wikipedia, such as the Illinois Police Reserves. 72.222.245.54 (talk) 05:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Then allow me to speak up for the original orignal Arizona Rangers, as established by the Territory in 1860 and reconstituted in 1882; in whatever form they took, their existence cannot be denied. I believe the subject "Arizona Rangers" as a title for research may have as much or more to do with the 19th century organizations as with the more modern reincarnations. Their passing mention in this entry all but denigrates their agency. I would therefore suggest an orderly historic review of the titled subject, or some form of split as mentioned in the opening of this discussion. Note that I have no expert knowledge in this subject but I have sought information about the earliest Arizona Rangers as a research topic. Zanski (talk) 05:17, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Arizona Rangers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:36, 24 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Arizona Rangers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:44, 17 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:08, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply