Talk:Armenia–Croatia relations
Latest comment: 9 years ago by BlueMoonset in topic GA Review
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Armenia–Croatia relations article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Armenia–Croatia relations was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 24, 2015. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Armenia's diplomatic relations with Croatia are handled through its embassy in Rome? | |||||||||
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Armenia–Croatia relations/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Winner 42 (talk · contribs) 04:20, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Overall Comments
editI understand that the nominator is somewhat inactive, but I'm going to give this review a shot. Winner 42 Talk to me! 04:20, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Overall this article will need significant expansion and copyediting to reach GA status. I suggest looking at Croatia–Hungary relations for an example of the coverage expected of a relationship of this type. I will place this article on hold to allow for improvements, please feel free to improve this as the nominator appears to be somewhat inactive. Winner 42 Talk to me! 16:01, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- The introduction of more images would also be helpful. Winner 42 Talk to me! 16:02, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Sectional Analysis
edit- Lead
- The last sentence here needs additional articles and an "and" at the end of the list of organizations.
- I'm concerned that this lead does not appropriately summarize the articles contents. For example, the lead does not discuss any of the treaties or trade policies between the countries.
- History
- Republic of Ragusa -> The Republic of Ragusa
- The first paragraph flows very poorly and is not well written
- gained a recognition -> recognized
- Representation
- Should this be a sub section of history?
- The circumstances surrounding the recognition of Croatia by Armenia could use expansion and clarification
- Treaties
- This section needs expansion in prose per WP:MOSLIST.
- Did Agreement between the Republic of Croatia and the Republic of Armenia for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income never enter into force?
- Trade and economic cooperation
- This section also needs expansion with prose. For example, what are the conditions of trade between the two countries, what goods are being traded etc...
- High Level visits
- Are these the only four high level visits between the two countries?
Review
editGA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused (see summary style):
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Closing comment
editThe nominator has not edited on Wikipedia since late June, the article itself hasn't been edited since early May, and the reviewer has just retired from Wikipedia. Given the issues raised in the review, I am closing this nomination; the article is not being listed. Should the nominator return, I suggest addressing all the issues raised in the review and consider completing a peer review before renominating. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:16, 16 September 2015 (UTC)