Talk:Aronia
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Herbal tea
editIsn't it also used as an ingredient in some commercially available herbal teas? Badagnani 18:56, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Definitely used by Eastern Europeans as a Vodka infusion as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.228.47.46 (talk) 01:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Also, according to the back of my Asda high juice bottle, it has 11% aronia juice. 82.69.80.47 (talk) 14:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Becoming more widespread as Ponceau 4R is being phased out. A quite useful underutilized crop - healthy, easily grown and yields a nice deep-red color. I suspect we're gonna see it more widely used in the near future. In Germany, one can find it explicitly advertised as an ingredient of fruit drinks etc since 2008 or so, though it is still very rarely seen. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 19:42, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Definitively grows wild in Poland (it is also cultivated). And we use it in juices and teas for very long time. Some consume it raw (although not many can stand the taste of raw aronia). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.235.77.234 (talk) 21:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
editThis article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 18:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
2 or 3?
editThe lead says there are two species but three are listed in the taxobox. Which is it? Huw Powell (talk) 22:05, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- I've changed it to 2-3 (the details are further down the page). Kingdon (talk) 02:12, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Where it grows =
editThe article implies it grows in North America, however it also grows widely in Finland and over the border into Russia. This article needs to be expanded to clarify where it is found growing in the wild and where it is cultivated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.252.236 (talk) 11:41, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Aronia berry versus chokeberry
editIncreasingly, the black chokeberry (aronia melanocarpa) is referred to as an aronia berry and that's how it's marketed when sold as a food product or dietary supplement due to its high antioxidant properties (which were discovered in 2004).
Should there be a separate page just for these aronia berries? If not, how can we make this page clearer? Ketinker (talk) 03:49, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- Yes. In general, every species is given its own page, so Aronia melanocarpa would be that page, changed from the redirect that it now is. The reason it doesn't exist is probably due to some confusion about whether there are two or three species in the genus, but there is plenty of information about that species for making a page. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 12:14, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aronia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090313035655/http://www.fruit.cornell.edu/Berries/specialtyfru%20pdf/aroniaeldeberry.pdf to http://www.fruit.cornell.edu/Berries/specialtyfru%20pdf/aroniaeldeberry.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:32, 9 July 2017 (UTC)