Talk:Aroon Purie

untitled

Sources are not properly quotted. Do add more sources and links. (Ashrafmedia (talk) 13:26, 14 March 2008 (UTC))

Do you have any Sources?

Do you have any Sources? Except when we were nanga, and India waa was a cool place to go to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thinkspank101 (talk • contribs) 19:30, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aroon Purie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080512015339/http://www.televisionpoint.com:80/lounge/lounge.php?id=1176397777 to http://www.televisionpoint.com/lounge/lounge.php?id=1176397777
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.aim.org.in/aroon%20Purie.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101123120853/http://fipp.com/News.aspx?PageIndex=2002&ItemId=14845 to http://www.fipp.com/News.aspx?PageIndex=2002&ItemId=14845

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:00, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aroon Purie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130624172532/http://www.globaleditorsnetwork.org:80/board-members/ to http://www.globaleditorsnetwork.org/board-members/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:53, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Plagiarism section

I've reduced the total word count in the plagiarism section; it seems really unbalanced to devote more words to an American journalist's response about the plagiarism of these paragraphs instead of the founding of India Today, a hugely important global publication. I do think the incident should be included, obviously, just that it wasn't enough of a controversy to justify big block quotes from both parties. When Purie passes, this incident seems like it will be a footnote in his obituary rather than the largest focus (as it was in the current article.)

But I will also try soon to expand the discussion of India Today's role in Indian journalism, which would also help with that balance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiCorvee (talk • contribs) 21:52, 5 December 2017 (UTC)