Talk:Asaram Bapu Ashram
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Asaram Bapu Ashram page were merged into Asaram Bapu on 10:54, 14 April 2014 (UTC). For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 May 2008. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This page must remain in the internet domain. The legendary Public figure has been accused for political benefits. Public should know what after his bails or clean chit. I contest speedy deletion of this page as this article provides information about a Non Governmental Organisation which is a non profit making entity working for charitable motives, so no ground as such advertising.(Rohitom (talk) 20:26, 25 May 2008 (UTC))
Please tell me how can make the article better, upto the standard of wikipedia ? (Rohitom (talk) 20:26, 25 May 2008 (UTC))
New section
editThe activity is running by asaramji and he like people i.e.Ramdevjibaba, SriSri ravishankar is so strong for a hindu nation that antihindus are trying to entrap all them &the ashram & forcefully dragging the ashram in bad activity.So all hindus should try to undersand with open heart and always believe the media's news after checking with logic.unfortunately anti hindu group is more active than before now a days. 18:17, 10 August 2008 (UTC)~~
Demands Review from Authorized Editors and Peer Group
editThe contents of this page should be rewritten. I show no disrespect to the personality on whom this page is written but the contents are not of expected quality. I repeat I show no disrespect to the person as a subject of this page.
Even, the page on the associations related to the honourable person are not written as per the norms of Wikipedia. (I myself have yet to read all of them.) In case of the Ashram page, having interlinked on this page, the bias and self promotion is quite evident.
Secondly, in India, every new day, a new Saint/Sant/Guru/Swami/Mata/Deva Mai/Amma comes up. It is working like a phenomena. It reflects some social realities and social strains in Indian society. Therefore, there is need to seek the advice of established editors and scholars having proven scholarship to evaluate the veracity of any such biographical entry. Further, every name which emerges as giving spiritual teaching should not be clubbed with Indian Religious/Socio-Religious/Spiritual Movement. Otherwise Wikipedia will become a Place for Public Relation Activity and may get involved in unsavoury controversy.--SumirSumir —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumir Sharma (talk • contribs) 15:27, 13 September 2009 (UTC)