Talk:Ashok Gehlot
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC) Letter written to Rajasthan Chief Minister by Union Health minister after the serial maternal deaths in Jodhpur which CNN-IBN has a copy of points out not just the inadequacies at the hospital but also urges Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot to take a look at the policy of allowing private practice for government doctors leading to their absenteeism at work. But 19 deaths later the situation on ground zero seems to be only going worse. Ashok Gehlot is worst chief minister of Rajasthan.. what kind of minister will allow 19 deaths within few months in a single hospital due to chaos at hospital. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.107.0.81 (talk) 20:05, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Bold text D/sir,
RCM is not chiet fund.
RCM IS pure MLM. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.172.149.14 (talk) 05:13, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
editI've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
"Vaibhav Gehlot" listed at Redirects for discussion
editA discussion is taking place to address the redirect Vaibhav Gehlot. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 14#Vaibhav Gehlot until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. —Avenue X at Cicero (t · c) sends his regards @ 10:32, 14 June 2020 (UTC)