Talk:Asian elephant/Archive 1

Archive 1

Untitled

There is a new elephant. The tests - which used the elephant's poo! - revealed that they became separated from other elephants around 300,000 years ago. They ended up on the Malaysian island of Borneo.

• http://lists.envirolink.org/pipermail/ar-news/Week-of-Mon-20030901/006023.html
• http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/quiz/newsid_1823000/1823206.stm">Click here to try

our elephant quiz</A> Anybody can update accordingly...Yosri 10:59, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Thai Elephants robbed to Australia, by Thai government

Thai state agencies and a successful mission to "robbed" 8 Thai elephants to Australia.

• Pa Ti Bat Kan Plon Chang Thai ปฏิบัติการปล้นช้างไทย (in Thai), OPEN Online (online magazine); first published in Matichon (newspaper), 6 August 2006

There's a rumour that Australian zoo paid around 2,000 Million THB for this. And Thai government agreed. -- anyway, IUCN, the World Conservation Union, categorized Thai Elephant as "Endangered", and no trade is allowed whatsoever.

Citation needed

Remove the following which looks suspect

Asian Elephants are more closely related to mammoths then they are to African Elephants. So it probably would be better to place the Asian Elephant in the genus Mammuthus, or to place all mammoths in the genus Elephas.

Shyamal 05:47, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Removed Hannibal's elephant Sarus

I have removed the reference to the leader elephant of Hannibal's stock. The fact that he was called "Syrian" does by no means indicate that he belonged to a Syrian subspecies. The Seleucids kings, who ruled in Syria in hellenistic times, used Indian elephants for their campaigns, which is well attested from ancient sources.

If Hannibal had a "Syrian" war-elephant, that probably meant he had been given an elephant of the Seleucid stock, possibly with the Ptolemies of Egypt as middlehand. The fact that Syrian elephants were extinct in 100 BCE is also very suspicious. 100 BCE is around the time when the Seleucids stopped using war-elephants, because their empire was falling to pieces. --Sponsianus 09:39, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Colbert related vandalism

I tried to remove the "tripled" statement but got lagged out. Bensaccount 04:22, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

National symbol of India?

This is included in Category:National symbols of India, but I thought Royal Bengal Tiger was the national animal. Can someone clarify and provide references, please? --Ragib 22:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

causes of population reduction

it would be nice if this page contained information on why the elephants are on the endangered species list and what is casuing the population reduction. also what is being done to preserve the populations could be included. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 192.124.34.175 (talk • contribs) .

FYI, according to TheWildOnes.org, the Asian Elephant is extinct in the wild of China. Just to let you know. This is a beautiful animal and its almost depressing that it could be totally extinct within the next 50 years... Chasingrainbows 16:23, 30 January 2007 (UTC)chasingrainbows

There wasnt even any detail on the number left. I've sourced that and added it to the lead, where I think it belongs. Hornplease 15:58, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

asian elephants are bred and domesticated all around the countries of the Indian ocean, and even worshipped in some societies. interesting to see that it's actually considered "endangered", while the african bush elephant is just "vulnerable" and the african forest elephant is considered "endangered", while those two species are hunted excessively. as an elephant species with less attitude against humans, these guys are still widely used by large populations in India. so I say that it can't be THAT endangered. that's why there NEEDS to be more info on why populations are dropping so fast. Spincrus 14:17, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Nepal

I saw a thing on the internet mentioning a new subspecies in Nepal that looked 'mastadonic'? It had photos. It said about 100 were said to be alive? Some mention of that, or at least a thing saying that it has been proven or disproven or is in the proces... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.8.26.10 (talk) 19:07, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Extinct?

The first paragraph of the article indicates only three subspecies of elephant are not extinct, yet the subspecies articles indicate these elephants are still in existence, though generally in low numbers. Clarification is needed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.139.226.8 (talk) 12:39, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Why the capitalization?

Why is this article entitled "Asian Elephant" instead of "Asian elephant" ? --75.58.54.17 01:56, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

See WP:BIRD for the rationale. = UtherSRG (talk) 10:54, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Irrelevant. First, those are only suggestions, which do not trump proper grammar and spelling. Second, WP:BIRDS does not even apply to anything except birds. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:15, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: will be done when the redirect is deleted. Kotniski (talk) 09:23, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

---

Asian Elephant → Asian elephant — Animal names are not proper nouns. A dog is not "a Dog"; more pointedly, an African elephant is not an "African Elephant".--Tenebrae (talk) 21:16, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Support move. Spidey104 20:02, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

• Support uncontroversial, use sentencing in titles. ^walk victor falk ^talk 10:31, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

 Done JohnCD (talk) 12:37, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Average weight?

The article gives only maximum weights. What about the average weight of adult elephants? Please add! -- 77.189.15.126 (talk) 11:27, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

"taxonomy" tidy-up time

This section is not tidy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_rhino

I suggest the above page as an idea towards a layout. The current information can be spliced into the list as a brief description of each subspecies or can be included at the end of the list to add further meaning to the list. Wuku (talk) 22:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Fact check

Photo text: " At this elephant training camp, captive elephants are taught to handle logs. "

Is it a fact that the site in question is training using goads ?

see "stimulus" at http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/stimulus

Is there scientific evidence from qualified unscheduled observers (audit) that Indian Elephants are not being "broken" at this camp in the manner not unlike that in which horses were routinely "broken" in the past in the USA and elsewhere? Does the "training camp" only accept previously "broken" elephants (as with many specialty horse "trainers") ?

The wp horse training article smooths the issue over by suggesting that "breaking" a horse is a synonym for, I quote,

 "The act of getting on a horse for the first time goes by many names, including backing, breaking, mounting, and simply riding."

For an alternate view, see the quasi-documentary with Robert Redford: "Buck". Buck Brannaman is not mentioned nor is there yet a See Also at horse training, perhaps an issue of NPOV.

G. Robert Shiplett 12:53, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Kerala 2011 fact request

I was surprised to see the fact challenge re: Kerala festival elephants, having worked with software teams based there.

The facts required for the atatement challenged are in existing wp articles, so I have provided those links.

Is that sufficient to meet FACT markup challenge ? I have removed the challenge as the links should suffice.

Thanks for feedback, as this is my first time making that sort of change to a wp article's markup.

G. Robert Shiplett 12:03, 31 March 2012 (UTC) - Previous comment added by Grshiplett (talk · contribs).

If there are reliable sources cited in other articles that support the challenged material, then those sources should also be cited in this article. Please remember that Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Reliable sources cited in other articles should be checked to verify that they do indeed support the material for which the citations are given. Also, please sign all of your posts on talk pages by adding four tildes (~~~~) at the end of the post. -- Donald Albury 15:58, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Photo overkill

While the photos are great, the sheer number creates display issues — even on a wide-screen monitor, one of the images overlaps part of text, etc. It is recommended that many of them be put in a {{Gallery}}, especially any which are not directly associated with the narrative, or are redundant. Currently the text and images often to not correspond. ~Thanks for your attention on this matter, ~E: 74.60.29.141 (talk) 21:27, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Hmm. They all display fine for me, but I agree with what you said about redundancy and non-correspondence. I'll see about thinning the herd (if you'll excuse the dreadful metaphor). Rivertorch (talk) 04:28, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Updating the above: I removed two images—File:Indian Elephant.jpg and File:Asian Elephant Elephas maximus.jpg—which didn't seem to add to the article in any significant way. The remaining ones all seem to illustrate something significant about the Asian elephant, but I guess a couple more could be cut if push came to shove. I moved three other images around a bit. There are probably a couple more that could be shuffled, but I'm curious to know how the article looks now. Any display problems? Rivertorch (talk) 05:10, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Basically I also think there were too many pics -- nice work, Rivertorch !! I would even go a little further in sorting out and removing pics, and suggest

• moving all the ones taken in captivity -- i.e. in both zoos and ele camps -- further down next to the section "In captivity";
• showing 2 of skeletons is sufficient -- so I would opt for removing the one from the Kolkata National Museum;
• instead : inserting one or two close up pics showing either trunk, skin or tusks from this collection next to the "Characteristics" section;

What do you think ?
When some (long) time ago I had revised the "Distribution and habitat" section, there were 3 pics, one of each subspecies, next to the text, but I suppose they all got displaced due to other pics being added somewhat randomly. If you are ready for some more pushing and shoving -- I'm in as well. BhagyaMani (talk) 11:16, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Oh, sure. Let's push and shove. I agree with your changes so far, and what you say makes sense. Rivertorch (talk) 17:18, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Let me know whether you like the changes. There are many more nice pics taken in the wild, which I prefer to all the ones taken in zoos, the more so as everybody can see them there anyway. There is no pic yet in the section "Threats" -- I would like to put one showing what a deforested area looks like that once used to be elephant habitat, or an ivory pic. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 19:19, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Nice work! Here's a deforestation picture from a prime elephant habitat in Arunachal - File:Jhum.jpg and my search skills are bad but an ivory seal from Japan is an apt picture for threats as that's a big market for Asian elephant ivory. (Yathin S Krishnappa (talk) 20:34, 7 December 2012 (UTC))

GREAT pic, Yathin sk !! Thanks for the link !! Since its foremost African ivory that is traded in Thailand and China, an ivory pic in this article may be a bit far-fetched (?) One showing some kind of conflict situation may be better to illustrate the link between deforestation and human-elephant conflict. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 21:17, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

As far as I know (and there's literature around) the Japanese seals are among the the most popular uses of ivory today. Perhaps something like File:Indian_-_Powder_Flask_-_Walters_71419_-_Back.jpg can illustrate the end product of ivory? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yathin sk (talk • contribs) 21:37, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Saw this one too. Then I will add a few lines about ivory trade in Thailand; have some reports about this issue; and place this pic next to text -- tomorrow. BhagyaMani (talk) 21:43, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Nice work, people. I've really enjoyed looking at the new pics, and I think they're excellent choices. I do have some slight reservations about the sudden lack of zoo pics, though. The reality is that there are a lot of Asian elephants in zoos, so it seems a bit odd that the article doesn't acknowledge that graphically. Maybe we could have just one. (But not this one! The perspective was jarring and afaik most zoo elephants don't get to go walkies.) Rivertorch (talk) 08:46, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Then how is about this idea: lets also write something about the endangered species breeding programme under "Conservation". A zoo pic would then correspond to text. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

That article doesn't seem to say anything about elephants, though. I'm going to look around and see what else I can find. You're right—it would be best to tie in the pic to the text. One thing I'd like to know, but the article doesn't say, is how many Asian elephants reside in zoos? Worldwide, it must be a significant population. Rivertorch (talk) 06:31, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

It looks much better now. It seemed chaotic before, and the pics ran down below the refs. I didn't really intend to suggest removing them entirely, how about having a {{gallery}} for the leftovers? I am currently collaborating on a major overhaul of Cultural depictions of elephants (volunteers welcome!) and what we are doing is putting pics in a gallery and retrieving them when discussed. ~ Which reminds me: would it be okay to put either a "Main article..." or "Further information..." link in your 'In culture' section? Or how about at least including Cultural depictions of elephants in the 'See also' list? ~Thanks again, ~E:74.60.29.141 (talk) 04:16, 9 December 2012 (UTC) [a.k.a.: ~Eric F]

Personally, I hate galleries. When I had a much slower Internet connection, the presence of galleries made editing certain articles painfully time-consuming. Not an issue for me anymore, but it still is for some of our contributors (not to mention our non-contributor readers) in certain parts of the world). The other problem with galleries is that they become something of a dumping ground for all sorts of images that don't really add anything to the article and are best residing over at Commons (which does have a category linked from this article). Just my opinion. Rivertorch (talk) 06:31, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Neither do I like galleries and agree with Rivertorch, the more so as there is the Commons link to a vast collection of pics. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 10:13, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Perhaps you're right. Except for an actual gallery representing an artist's work, or similar. The article I'm working on is tagged "Under construction" and the gallery is basically a drop-box for potentially useful images. Another thing I've noticed about a different article I did for an actual artist, is that once you create a gallery for the good stuff, folks feel compelled to add the [other] [stuff]. ~E:74.60.29.141 (talk) 12:28, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Domestication

Are any elephants used as beasts of burden actually domesticated, i.e. bred and reared specifically for human purposes? Jared Diamond's book Guns, Germs, and Steel say all elephants used as such are actually tamed, not "domesticated" in the technical sense. k 14:06, 10 August 2006 (PST)

The use of the term "Domestication" with respect to elephants is not appropriate and contributes to widespread misunderstanding as well as undermines conservation status in the wild. Domestication refers to the process by which organisms are selectively bred by humans for certain attributes (e.g. docility, size, yield) over multiple generations. Asian elephants have never been domesticated in this sense, with work animals typically being captured from the wild and females being bred by wild males. Capture of elephant calves for work and tourism in fact threatens the viability of wild populations ( Leimgruber et al. 2008). Though today there are elephants born in captive facilities, they are not truly "domesticated." Thus this term needs revision throughout the literature concerning this species and its conservation status. 129.82.80.215 (talk) 20:29, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Sherminds (talk) 20:32, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 April 2014

Please change the following text:

"The genus Elephas originated in Sub-Saharan Africa during the Pliocene ranging throughout Africa into southern Asia.[2] The earliest indications of domestication of Asian elephants are engravings on seals of the Indus Valley civilization dated as third millennium BC.[6]"

into the following: "The genus Elephas originated in Sub-Saharan Africa during the Pliocene ranging throughout Africa into southern Asia.[2] The earliest indications of the use of Asian elephants in captivity are engravings on seals of the Indus Valley civilization dated as third millennium BC.[6]"

Also please change the heading "Domestication" into "Elephants in Captivity" and all such references throughout the document (e.g. "domestic"/"domesticated elephants" to "captive elephants")

And correspondingly please change the following text: "The first historical record of the domestication of Asian elephants was in Harappan times.[30] Ultimately, the elephant went on to become a siege engine, a mount in war, a status symbol, a Beast of burden, and an elevated platform for hunting during historical times in South Asia.[31]"

Into: "Contrary to popular belief, the Asian elephant has never been domesticated. Domestication entails the selective breeding of an organism by humans over multiple generations in favor of particular traits. In contrast, elephants have historically been captured from the wild for use in human activities. The first historical record of use of elephants in captivity was in Harappan times.[30] Ultimately, the elephant went on to become a siege engine, a mount in war, a status symbol, a Beast of burden, and an elevated platform for hunting during historical times in South Asia.[31]" Today, the capture of elephants from the wild is banned in most range states, yet illegal capture is a pressing conservation concern as many wild populations are threatened. Leimgruber et al. 2008 and de Silva et al. 2013)

Justification: There is no such thing as a domesticated elephant. The term "domestic" and variants thereof should not be used with respect to Asian elephants, as this species has never truly been domesticated in the sense that it has never been selectively bred by humans over multiple generations. Many of the elephants used in captivity are wild-caught, and despite modern-day attempts to breed elephants in captivity the species does poorly in captivity and is not nor has it ever been "domesticated." Widespread misuse of this term leads to confusion regarding the status conservation status of Asian elephants, which are endangered and highly threatened in the wild. Capture from the wild for use in captivity in fact continues to endanger wild populations (see Leimgruber et al. 2008 and de Silva et al. 2013). Currently the capture of elephant calves from the wild is banned but an illegal trade exists. Since Wikipedia is so widely consulted by the public, this misconception is worth correcting here first. Please see "Domestication" in the Talk section. Sherminds (talk) 20:55, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. This sounds like the sort of change which should have an actual consensus before it is implemented. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 04:18, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Size

Are the Asian elephants smaller than the Forest Elephant? I thought the Forest Elephant was the smallest Elephant. john k 15:38, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Also, the first sentence in the size section "As is common with large animals, the dimensions of the Asian elephant are often exaggerated" either needs a citation or needs to be deleted. -Thomas — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.99.150.50 (talk) 21:21, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Asian elephant. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.asiannature.org/pdf_resources/JournalofTropicalEcologyB1989.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:26, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Asian elephant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080929164945/http://www.elefantasia.org:80/spip.php?rubrique3&lang=en to http://www.elefantasia.org/spip.php?rubrique3&lang=en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:56, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Closest New World relative?

According to paleontologist Paul S. Martin, Asian elephants are more closely related to extinct North American mammoths, Mammuthus, than to African elephants. This agrees with the cladogram we use at Mammoth. Might be worth a mention here. His context is, he half-seriously proposed introducing Asian elephants to former Mammoth territory in North America, as a proxy for the extinct Mammoths, likely driven to (local) extinction by Clovis-era hunters. --Pete Tillman (talk) 02:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Asian elephant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160623163935/http://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/2014/apr/28/wild-elephants-nightmare-sherpur-villagers to http://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/2014/apr/28/wild-elephants-nightmare-sherpur-villagers
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714144420/http://www.elephant-news.com/index.php?id=1613 to http://www.elephant-news.com/index.php?id=1613

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 February 2018

please undo edit by grimpantom. river torch undo once already & grimpantom blocked for he is villanous user who damage pages with fake facts. 143.112.144.129 (talk) 18:46, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. All Grimphantom did was switch the order between females and males in the height date, using the same data as previously. There are no "fake facts" involved and calling another editor a "villanous <sic> user" can be grounds for blocking accounts. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

eggishorn doesnt wikipedia have policy for undo all block editor contributions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.112.144.129 (talk) 13:59, February 13, 2018‎

No, it does not: This does not mean that edits must be reverted just because they were made by a blocked editor (obviously helpful changes, such as fixing typos or undoing vandalism, can be allowed to stand)... I hope this helps. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:04, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

oh i retract my request — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.112.144.129 (talk) 14:05, February 13, 2018‎

For the record, I reverted primarily because I misread the diff and thought the numbers had been mixed up. If there had been an edit summary, I might have read it more carefully. Their more recent edit, which restored their changes, had an edit summary that I don't necessarily agree with, but I can't imagine that it makes any difference to the quality of our encyclopedia which sex's dimensions are listed first. Sockpuppetry notwithstanding, here was no villainy here and nothing nonfactual. Thanks for withdrawing your request. Rivertorch^FIRE_WATER 11:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

discussion : split into a new article titled 'Elephant behaviour' ?

I disagree to split. Looks like this proposal did not find anybody's consent in the past 6 months. Therefore, I suggest to remove the invitation to discuss. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 07:30, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 25 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Awmccann.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:51, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Chemical Ecology

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Eb1002 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Symbiologist (talk) 16:13, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 August 2023

Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, China, India,Owenh08 (talk) 02:52, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. UtherSRG (talk) 11:15, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

@Owenh08: I see from your initial post that you were asking for Bangladesh and China to be wikilinked in the taxonomy table. I have now linked Bangladesh there, but not China, and have unlinked India, in accordance with the guidance at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking, as China and India have already been linked in the preceeding section. Donald Albury 14:16, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Asian elephant/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Wolverine XI (talk · contribs) 18:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Magentic Manifestations (talk · contribs) 05:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Will be taking this up for review. Expect comments soon. Thanks!

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	comments below. Y
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Do a simple check. There are simple issues like links to non-existent articles. Others as part of comments below. Y
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Page nos./links are missing in most book sources Y
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.	On dip stick of few sections, there are many lines which are not sourced or poorly sourced. Comments below. Y
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	As per Earwig, it is fine.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Addressed Y
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Fairly precise
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Adheres to NPOV
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Relatively stable, no major conflicts
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	The usage of images and the captions need to be worked upon. a. Images have been added like a vertical gallery which spills out of sections E.g. Refer to the first three sections b. Inappropriate or irrelevant in certain cases E.g. How is pigmentation relevant to distribution? Not sure what is being conveyed by the set of images in the sections ecology and behavior, reproduction. Appropriate and limited images will serve better. c. Captions often does not indicate relevance to why the image was used e.g. what does "Indian elephants in the Coimbatore Forests, Tamil Nadu" has to do with reproduction? If it is a male and a female , it is better to caption it that way to indicate the relevance to the section. "A 5-month-old calf and its 17-month-old cousin in a sanctuary in Laos", how do we know the age and if it is his/her cousin and what is the relevance? Y
	7. Overall assessment.	@Wolverine XI I have put this on hold for the time being. In the few sections that have been reviewed, it is found that the article needs working, particularly in terms of providing citations as there are multiple lines no valid references and page nos./link for quoted citations, expansion of sections, apart from other issues. It would be better if you do a re-check on the entire article based on the citations. From the comments, it might be concluded that the article fails some of the basic criteria. But I believe that discussing with the respective GA nominator to consider how the article concerned can be reworked and the changes can be made quite quickly with conscious effort, the nominator be willing. First, we need to agree on it and I look forward to hearing your response. @Magentic Manifestations: I've replied/addressed all your comments. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 21:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC) @Wolverine XI: Appreciate the effort. Have made a few minor changes and added additional comments for the previously not reviewed sections + improvements required in red. Please address the same as well. Thanks. @Magentic Manifestations: I've now addressed everything. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 08:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC) @Wolverine XI: It satisfies the GA criteria post the changes. Promoting now. Nice working with you. Congratulations on the GA! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 08:32, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Lead

1. from India in the west, Nepal in the north, Sumatra in the south, and to Borneo in the east. India in the west to Borneo in the east and Nepal in the north to Sumatra in the South?

• Fixed (modified it, Y)

2. small ears folded laterally in contrast to African elephants smaller ears than African elephants or lateral folding is different compared to African?

• Specified (modified it, Y)

3. may be depigmented on the trunk, ears or neck and/or?

• Or (Y)

4. Female captive elephants have lived beyond 60 years when kept in semi-natural surroundings, such as forest camps. In zoos, Asian elephants die at a much younger age; Normal lifespan of wild elephants?

• Added (modified it, Y)

5. Lead can have a line on intelligence?

• Added (modified it, Y)

Taxonomy

1. Three subspecies are recognised:
a. IUCN source does not talk about sub-species?

• It does (Y)

b. The table gives four sub-species when it is indicated as three?

• The last one (Bornean) is uncertain
• Fixed (modified it, Y)

c. The usage of table is suspect here. If a table is used, better to split into species/image/description/distribution

• No need, removed table (Y)

d. There is no explanation on the demarcation between the sub-species

• There's no need for that While not a requirement from GA per say, would be better if there is some explanation on the demarcation features

• Added something

2. but not a living elephant in accordance with the rules of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature Primary source does not have link/page nos.

• Added (Y)

3. The Asian elephants living in northern Borneo are smaller than all the other subspecies, but with larger ears, a longer tail, and straight tusks source?

• Added (Y)

4. The following Asian elephants were proposed as extinct subspecies, but are now considered synonymous with the Indian elephant
a. The source indicates that Deraniyagala identified 12 sub species 8 living but the classification (above 3 + Borneo + below 3 = 7) does not match. There is no naming of the species.

• That is from 1955. Today there are only 3 subspecies not 8. And most sources concur that only those 3 extinct subspecies are valid. (Modified, Y)

b. The list is again based on the source already indicated with no link/page nos.

• The link is there (Y)

5. The two groups are estimated to have split from each other around 7 million years ago Source does not mention this, page no.?

• You need to pay to access the whole study Then it becomes unverifiable, you need to find an alternate source!

• Fixed (Y)

6. Elephas originated in Sub-Saharan Africa during the Pliocene and spread throughout Africa before expanding into the southern half of Asia. No page no. or link provided for the book source

• Added (Y)

Description

1. The forehead has two hemispherical bulges, unlike the flat front of the African elephants The enamel plates of the molars are greater in number and closer together in Asian elephants. Some bulls may also lack tusks; these individuals are called "filsy makhnas", and are especially common among the Sri Lankan elephant population These lines quote a book source with page no. 208. As per the contents of the book, elephants are described in page 141 and it cannot be verified as well.

• Fixed given link does not have the required pages, assuming good faith here for the first citation. Additional references have been added for the others. (Y)

2. A tusk from an 11 ft (3.4 m) tall elephant killed by Sir Victor Brooke measured 8 ft (2.4 m) in length, and nearly 17 in (43 cm)... Please add page no. 522/523 to source

• Fixed (Y)

3. The largest bull elephant ever recorded was shot by the Maharajah of Susang in the Garo Hills of Assam, India, in 1924, it weighed an estimated 7 t (7.7 short tons), stood 3.43 m (11.3 ft) tall at the shoulder and was 8.06 m (26.4 ft) long from head to tail Add page no. 17 to Guinness book source

• Fixed (Y)

Distribution and habitat

1. Asian elephants are distributed throughout the Indian subcontinent and Southeast Asia, from India in the west, Nepal in the north, Sumatra in the south, and to Borneo in the east Same as lead

• Fixed (modified, Y)

2. It inhabit They inhabit

• Fixed (Y)

3. In Bangladesh, some isolated populations survived in the south-east Chittagong Hills in the early 1990s no page nos.

• Added (Y)

4. In 2011, the Asian elephant population in India was estimated at 26,000–28,000 individuals. Updated data available for 2017, please refer to Project Elephant

• Added (Y)

4. As of 2019, the wild population was estimated at 48,323–51,680 individuals This is in India or worldwide?

• Specified (Y)

Ecology and behaviour

1. Asian elephants are recorded to make three basic sounds.. Sourced from a single book source with no page no.

• Page no is 142 (Y)

Reproduction

1. observed 3 weeks from three weeks

• Fixed (Y)

2. The gestation period is 18–22 months, and the cow gives birth to one calf, only occasionally twins. The calf is fully developed by the 19th month, but stays in the womb to grow so that it can reach its mother to feed. At birth, the calf weighs about 100 kg (220 lb), and is suckled for up to three years. Once a female gives birth, she usually does not breed again until the first calf is weaned, resulting in a four to five-year birth interval. Source?

• Added (Y)

Intelligence

1. They exhibit a wide variety of behaviours, including those associated with grief, learning, allomothering, mimicry, play, altruism, use of tools, compassion, cooperation, self-awareness, memory, and language source?

• Done (Y)

2. Sources with no pages/links e.g. "Elephant Bill", "Thirteen years among the wild beasts of India."

• Done (Y)

Threats

1. Few sources need links/relevant identifiers e.g. "An assessment of the human-elephant conflict in Sri Lanka.", "Elephant raiders and rogues."

• Added (Y)

2. Prime elephant habitat cleared for jhum—a type of shifting cultivation practiced in Arunachal Pradesh Source for it being prime elephant habitat?

• Source already there (modified, Y)

3. In India alone, over 400 people are killed by elephants every year, and 0.8 to 1 million hectares are damaged, affecting at least 500,000 families across the country. Moreover, elephants are known to destroy crops worth up to US$2–3 million annually Data for which period?

• Added (Y)

4. The demand for ivory during the 1970s and 1980s, particularly in East Asia, led to rampant poaching and the serious decline of elephants in both Africa and Asia. source?

• Source already provided (Y)

5. Young elephants are captured and illegally imported to.. captured from where?

• The wild (Y)

6. The section of handling should come with captivity. In fact, as the captivity section talks nothing about conservation, it is better to merge and place it under threats.

• Moved handling section, but made In captivity into its own section (Y)

7. The EEHVs are member What is EEHV?

• Fixed (modified, Y)

8. as many as 70 deaths of both zoo and wild Asian elephants worldwide, period?

• Fixed (Y)

Conservation

1. Section needs expansion. It barely talks about conservation measures in countries with elephant pop. India having the largest pop. has no mention, Project Elephant? What about conservation of other sub-species in SL, SE Asia?

• Added info (Y)

2. In total, the covered protected area in China is about 510,000 km2 (200,000 sq mi) Source says hectares and not km2?

• Fixed (Y)

3. In recent years the National Park has faced issues due to encroachment and over-exploitation. In India, the National Board of Wildlife recommended to allow coal mining in Dehing Patkai National Park in April 2020. The decision raised concerns between students and environmental activists who launched an online campaign to stop the project Should be part of threats?

• Wouldn't make much sense there (Y)

Captivity

1. The entire section talks about issues w.r.t to captive elephants in zoos rather than conservation. Also, it does not talk about the usage of elephants (section on handling briefly mentions some instances) in captivity for other uses such as for recreation, work, religious activities etc.
2. About half of the global zoo elephant population is kept in European zoos source?

• Source there (Y)

3. where they have about half the median life span of conspecifics in protected populations in range countries 18.9 years for zoos, and 41.7; 18.9 is not half of 41.7! Better to mention the nos.

• Addressed. I do not want the phrasing to be too close. (modified, data can be specific, Y)

4. infant mortality is twice that seen in Burmese timber camps, and adult survivorship in zoos has not improved significantly in recent years 2.3 and 3.4 times greater as per source

• Addressed. (Y)

5. Foot problems are commonly observed in captive elephants. These are related to lack of exercise, long hours standing on hard substrates, and contamination resulting from standing in their dung. Many of these problems are treatable. However, mistreatment may lead to serious disability or death No page no/link

• Replaced (Y)

In culture

1. Bones of Asian elephants excavated at Mohenjo-daro in the Indus Valley indicate that they were tamed in the Indus Valley Civilisation and used for work. Decorated elephants are also depicted on seals and were modelled in clay Source has no page no./link

• I don't have access to that source is unverifiable, need a different source

• Fixed (Y)

2. The Asian elephant became a siege engine, a mount in war, a status symbol, a beast of burden, and an elevated platform for hunting during historical times in South Asia Source has no page no./link

• The link and page numbers are already provided (Y)

3. Asian elephants have been captured from the wild... Apart from the last line, most of the paragraph is not sourced

• Fixed (Y)

4. The Asian elephant plays an important ... The source does not have page no/links; Not sure if the source attests to the facts in the paragraph.

• Yes & addressed. (Y)

5. The manuscript Hastividyarnava is from Assam in northeast India. In the Burmese, Thai and Sinhalese animal and planetary zodiac, the Asian elephant, both tusked and tuskless, are the fourth and fifth animal zodiacs of the Burmese, the fourth animal zodiac of the Thai.. None of the sentences are sourced

• Added sources (Y)

Suggestion: Asian elephant is the national animal of Thailand and is the national heritage animal of India. You may incorporate this in the last section.

• Added (Y)

Subspecies

@BhagyaMani: How many Asian elephant subspecies are there? Is it three or four? What do recent studies say? Can you update the Taxonomy section accordingly? Thanks. Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 12:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

The info in this section is still up-to-date : still 3 subspecies recognised : Indian, Sri Lankan + Sumatran, but not the Bornean as of 2020. The Bornean is traditionally included under the Indian, and I did not find any paper on taxonomic status of Bornean elephant later than 2020, i.e. the notes in resp. Red List. BhagyaMani (talk) 13:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Life expectancy

This (Average elephant life expectancy is 60 years in the wild and 80 in captivity, although this has been exaggerated in the past.) particular sentence cites a study from 1982. I'm unsure that this could still be considered accurate data. 162.106.4.146 (talk) 18:31, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Do you know of any more recent studies in reliable sources that would change this? We do prefer more recent published studies if they have been accepted by appropriate peers. However, older sources are perfectly fine if they are still generally accepted in the field of study. Donald Albury 19:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)