Talk:Aspen/Pitkin County Airport
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aspen/Pitkin County Airport article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Incidents section?
editWikipedia pages on airports generally have a section on aviation incidents (e.g. crashes) that have occurred there. Unless Aspen is miraculously crash-free since its founding, it should have an incidents section as well. (I don't have the knowledge necessary to write such a section, but I'm sure that info would be available on the NTSB/FAA websites.) KBurchfiel (talk) 04:31, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Northwest
editI've removed Northwest, as they no longer fly to ASE. [1] [2] --75.72.161.204 00:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Good information, but unsourced
editThank you to the person who made a bunch of changes from 205.170.51.30 on 24 August. If you can add some inline citations, that would be most helpful. Also, consider registering an account. You clearly have the knowledge and desire to contribute.
S4n1HS22WMX695In (talk) 01:57, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Requested move
editThis discussion was listed at Wikipedia:Move review on 19 November 2012. The result of the move review was Closure endorsed. |
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: speedy close, disruptive, WP:SNOW. -- JHunterJ (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Aspen–Pitkin County Airport → Aspen-Pitkin County Airport – Spelling. Apteva (talk) 01:44, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Survey
edit- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''
or*'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
- Oppose, as I don't think there's a place called "Aspen-Pitkin" or "Aspen-Pitkin County". 213.246.91.158 (talk) 08:33, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
- Irrelevant. That is the name of the airport, and therefore that is the name we should be using for the article. We do not get to make up spellings of items that have established names, like airports. Apteva (talk) 05:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose, per MOS and various other recent discussions on other hyphen⇔en dash moves. PaleAqua (talk) 02:42, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- MOS does not apply - it does not tell us how to spell airports, and as far as I have been able to determine, there are no proper nouns which include an endash, while there are many that use a hyphen. It would be wise to include the name of this airport as an example in the MOS, as suggested (spelled with a hyphen). Right now there are at least three examples in the endash section which are incorrectly spelled, using the wrong punctuation and/or the wrong capitalization (one is marked as under discussion). How is anyone to believe the MOS when it is riddled with errors? Apteva (talk) 05:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- Here is a proper name with en dash (Aspen–Pitkin County Airport). More books use slash than hyphen in styling this proper name, indicating a parallel relationship between the city and the county; that's the sort of relationship for which WP style uses the en dash. Dicklyon (talk) 05:46, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- Any additional comments:
- Multi: these individual RMs to remove dashes from titles are all part of Apteva's one persistently disruptive anti-MOS initiative, and should really be considered as one question if reconsidered at all. See currently open Talk:Fort Lauderdale–Hollywood International Airport#Requested move and Talk:Seattle–Tacoma International Airport#Requested move 2 as well as closed Talk:Seattle–Tacoma International Airport#Requested move, Talk:Manchester–Boston Regional Airport#Requested move, Talk:Dillant–Hopkins Airport#Requested move, and Talk:Ephraim–Gibraltar Airport#Requested move, (to say nothing of his similar efforts on wars, comets, etc.). If I knew of any cases where his suggestion prevailed, I'd link those, too. Dicklyon (talk) 18:45, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- What is disruptive is someone else moving these to using an endash, when a hyphen is clearly called for. There are 9,000 airports, and none use an endash. These could have been combined, but are more easily discussed separately. Apteva (talk) 21:59, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy close for disruption — kwami (talk) 00:23, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
- It is never disruption to fix errors. It is, however disruption to introduce them. There are 9,000 airports, and none are spelled using an endash. Apteva (talk) 06:09, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aspen–Pitkin County Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707175933/http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/county/countycode/Pitkinco10tx.pdf to http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/county/countycode/Pitkinco10tx.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)