Talk:Astrological sign
 | The contents of the Debility (astrology) page were merged into Astrological sign on 10 October 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 200 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Astrological sign for graphic designers
editSome artists/designers referring to this Wikipedia page might still find it difficult to reproduce the astrological signs in high-resolution details. I've found an easy way. Would someone familiar with this article please include this info in the article (in the proper place and style)?
To produce the 12 signs in a Windows environment, input "^_`abcdefghi" and apply the "Wingdings" font. Voila, you can enlarge to say 50 point font, and output your graphic file to EPS/PNG/JPG format for very fine graphic details.
I will try to demonstrate it here:
^_`abcdefghi.
Regards, Jason — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.187.188.153 (talk • contribs) August 9, 2006 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 1 June 2024
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I think this new scientific study could be added to this page. Please someone add it to the pargaraph starting with "Astrology is a pseudoscience....".
i suggest this:
Astrology is a pseudoscience.[3] Scientific investigations of the theoretical[4] basis and experimental verification of claims[5] have shown it to have no scientific validity or explanatory power. A scientific study, for example, found that zodiac signs are no better than random numbers in predicting life outcomes (citation)"
The sun's position at birth is unrelated to subjective well-being: Debunking astrological claims https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12395 Astroresearchh (talk) 07:52, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Not done for now. This citation might be a better fit at Astrology. This article is mostly about the astrological signs themselves. 〜 Askarion ✉ 17:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2024
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I believe the Gemini dates (start date specifically) is incorrect, I am 99.9% sure and I only know this because my mom and I are both Gemini and her birthday is May 21st.
The line should be changed FROM: Gemini The Twins ♊︎ 22 May 21 June
TO: Gemini The Twins ♊︎ 21 May 21 June Sirena.blanch (talk) 08:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Not done: Note the qualifiers: "approximate dates", "the start date of all signs can change slightly from year to year". Hyphenation Expert (talk) 09:40, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
