Wikipedia

Talk:Automatic number-plate recognition in the United Kingdom

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 192.114.91.248 in topic Removal
Learn more about this page

Controversial

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

How about stating that this cuts down people's liberty long time?? I haven't edited anything ever, and I'm not familiar with the wikipedia standards or procedures. But what I do know is that this article only points out the beneficial facts of this system and not the trespassing on civil rights. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.59.221.212 (talk) 20:40, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Also worth mentioning lack of covering legislation making the system actually legal. It's been built without any parliamentary agreement as far as I'm aware. At least, which bits of legislation presently defend it, if any. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.171.114.12 (talk) 13:57, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ring of steel

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Worth mentioning London's Ring of steel in the text or a separate see also section? GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 20:50, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Exaggeration

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Many of the statements in this article are gross exaggerations. Yes the police and the UK government have conspired to place the whole population under surveillance, and not just when they are motoring. Yes, Britain is a surveillance society, big time, and for anyone concerned with liberty it is now a dreadful place to live - even worse than America, land of the unfree. However, the statement that all CCTV are being geared up to ANPR capability is just not true. I get the impression that this article reflects Britain in 3-5 years time, not as it is now. 86.31.101.59 21:03, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Are there any statements in particular which you believe require further citations? GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 21:11, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
A large part of the article is copyright violation. Much of the material has been copied from The Register, and that publication is given as a reference. I like The Register, but its material should not form the basis for an article such as this. Also, reference 3 is an opinion piece and not a good source. In fact, this article is really just a re-hash of several newspaper reports. 86.31.101.59 21:19, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Removal

edit
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

"Starting in 2006 Britain will become the first country in which every journey of every vehicle is monitored and recorded.[1]"

Clearly although the Indy said this it it prima facie not encyclopedic. Rich Farmbrough, 11:21 28 May 2008 (GMT).

I've removed the following irrelevant content: In the United States, the misuse of ANPR has led to car confiscations[2] for 'crimes' such as “frequenting a bawdy place.” Richard Diamond commented that "Now it’s a constitutional nightmare, mocking fundamental and cherished legal protections: the right to be presumed innocent, the right to a trial by jury, the right not to have excessive fines imposed, the right not to be searched or have your property seized without reason or warrant, and the right to due process."[2]

It may be relevant in another article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leboite (talk • contribs) 14:46, 29 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

There are some discrepancies in the article regarding the amount of time the data is stored for, the article sites both one and two years — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.114.91.248 (talk) 12:08, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "Britain will be first country to monitor every car journey" at The Independent
  2. ^ a b Automatic number plate recognition Opinion: Unreasonable Search and Seizure
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Automatic number plate recognition in the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:27, 22 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Automatic number plate recognition in the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:46, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

The copyvio report shows some of the copied text is quotes hence not a copyvio and the remainder is small enough to be fixed without deleting the article. Whizz40 (talk) 09:26, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, that was definitely an erroneous CSD. I seen that it was a 81% match on the copyvio tool, and that a majority of the text was a match. I was thinking that because of this, nuke it. Thus the CSD. Again, sorry. Still new to editing, and still learning these complicated matters. Boomer VialHappy Holidays! • Contribs 03:22, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
No worries. I started to address the parts that are copyvio, will continue after Christmas. Feel free to assist with rewriting or removing the relevant parts of the article, or adding in-text attribiutions. Whizz40 (talk) 08:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Automatic_number-plate_recognition_in_the_United_Kingdom&oldid=1205520215"