This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Azendohsauridae is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The Azendohsauridae were in 2015 defined as a clade. They were not indicated as a familia nova. So, despite the ~idae suffix, they were not formally named as a family. They seem to be only a "family" per Wikipediam...--MWAK (talk) 07:21, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Indeed, this was why I had preferred to describe it as "family-level clade" when I expanded the article, though I can see how even this is problematic when papers have avoided calling it a family or even "family-level" (though the paper coining Azendohsauridae does refer to its sister clade Trilophosauridae as a "family-level clade"). That said, I have since noticed that Azendohsauridae was registered in ZooBank as a family [1], but I don't know what Wikipedia's stance on this sort of situation is and what people's thoughts are. DrawingDinosaurs (talk | contribs) 06:49, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
