Talk:B46 (New York City bus)
B46 (New York City bus) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 8, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from B46 (New York City bus) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 June 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 0 external links on Utica and Reid Avenues Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.example.com/map.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Name mistake
edit@Epicgenius: Can you help deal with this mess? Thanks.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 00:40, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Kew Gardens 613: Done. That unclosed parenthesis is now closed. epicgenius (talk) 01:26, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:B46 (New York City bus)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk · contribs) 18:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: Pass
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Review
editLead
editRoute description and service
edit- Are four references necessary to prove
to the Essex Street terminal in the Lower East Side of Manhattan
?
Current bus service
edit- Are six references necessary to prove
which replaced the trolley terminal
? - Is
short-turn
what you meant?- Done
Fare evasion and safety issues
edit- Please define acronym MTA
- Done
History
edit- Are four references necessary to prove
charged for transfer to the Reid Avenue Line
By 1994, service decreased by 21% since the late 1980s as ridership decreased due to competition from illegal van services, but as enforcement was increased in summer 1993, ridership increased by 20%.
You could removeas ridership decreased
as the word "decreased" is quite close together and it is a wordy sentence.- Done
- Please add a reference at the end of
return trip from the subway stop
.- Done
Select Bus Service
edit- 8 should be spelt out as eight
- Done
- Please define acronym DOT
- Done
References
edit- Reference #3 needs a publisher (NYT)
- Done
- Reference #4, #15, #26, #54, #60 are dead
- Done
- Reference #17 needs an access date
- Done
- Can you please clip reference #19, #22, #33, #34, #36, #38, #39, #40, #41, #43, #44, #46, #51
- Done
- Can #47 get a page number?
- Done
- Easy pass. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 23:43, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- ... that the B46 bus has been called "the most dangerous bus route" in New York City? Source: New Yorker
- ALT1:... that limited-stop service on New York City's B46 bus was implemented as a method to compete with unlicensed van services? Source: NY Daily News
Improved to Good Article status by Tdorante10 (talk) and Kew Gardens 613 (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 15:07, 13 May 2020 (UTC).
- @Epicgenius: Promoted to GA on 8 May, well referenced, no obvious close paraphrasing, QPQ done. The original hook is far more interesting than the alt, and is cited in the lead. However, where the body states "In 2014, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) ranked the B46 route as the "most dangerous and crime-ridden bus route" in terms of fare evasion and on-bus assaults", the reference given ([1]) does not support this at all and only mentions the B46 bus in a caption, not in the main text of the source. Could you replace this reference? 97198 (talk) 03:55, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- 97198, thanks for the review. I have removed the Metro ref. epicgenius (talk) 13:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- for the original hook, which is the most interesting of the two. 97198 (talk) 08:39, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
0129615198
editبرنسيسة برنسيسة 41.95105.159 41.95.104.159 (talk) 11:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)