Talk:BL 15-pounder gun

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / British / European / World War I C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

The Palmerston Fort Society links are broken, but the content has been transferred to the Victorian Forts site. Links here need to be changed accordingly. See here Vicarage (talk) 20:35, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

The photograph is of a 12pr BL gun not a 15pr. It is clearly labelled as such in the Navy and Army Illustrated article December 20th 1895 from which it originates. David Moore 12:25, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

I suggest the NAI caption is incorrect - this image has all the detail markers of 15 pounder : wheels, carriage, date : I went through this when I originally uploaded the image. Having said that, if there is doubt, we need an unambiguously identified photo in the article. I'll change it. Rcbutcher (talk) 14:02, 10 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

I think that this is a good decision. The photograph was taken in August 1895, according the article in NAI. Admittedly this is the same year in which all 12prs were designated as 15prs but examining the photo in detail the carriage is certainly a Mark II for 12pr, not the Mark III or IV on which all new pattern 15prs were issued. It is safer to assume that the gun in question was constructed as a 12pr.B.L. even if it was re-designated at a later date.David Moore 12:59, 12 November 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Alan Moore (talk • contribs)

Add topic