Talk:Babaji Rajah Bhonsle Chattrapathi
Latest comment: 12 years ago by JHunterJ in topic Requested moves
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Requested moves
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:02, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Bhonsle Chattrapathi → Babaji Rajah Bhonsle Chattrapathi – - Unexplained move by User:Kittybrewster. The subject has never ever been known by this name.-RaviMy Tea Kadai 17:22, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'd guess she was applying the general principle that we don't include honorifics in article names - see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility). However since it is the form used by both newspaper links in the article, I think we can apply the principle that "It is generally advisable to use the most common form of the name used in reliable sources in English ("common name" in the case of royalty and nobility may also include a person's title)", so I would Support the move.FlagSteward (talk) 17:20, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support Bhonsle is just his Surname and Chattrapathi his title, which does differentiate him from any other "Bhonsle Chattrapathi"s, his predecessors. --Redtigerxyz Talk 03:29, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.