Talk:Bachi Karkaria

Hang on

Bachi Karkaria is a very senior and well known columnist in India's largest newspaper. She brings with her years of experience and there must be a wiki page on her.

Conflict of interest suspected

This Article has been substantially created by one person, who has not contributed anywhere else to WP --Greenmaven (talk) 07:19, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

So? Keep suspecting if you so please. I'm hereby thanking the gentle-souled person to whom credit is due for creating it. PS: Ok, so we know from your UP and the belles and wit-salles on it as to what time it is now at where you live at, but is that not only half the info - and why so, pray? Rgds ... 117.194.71.76 (talk) 13:09, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, its not only about well researched Articles but also about well informed Talk and about better layout on all pages (particularly some user pages) :P VivekM (talk) 13:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Questions

Would the powers that be amongst the (x raised to n)Wikipedians consider this: Whatever issues the editors and/or the bots and/or the Board or any entity have with the content of the any particular article, should come at the head of the Talk page and not in boxes heading the Article itself which uglify in so many ways so many things - to begin with, the contributions of those who have made the Article possible at all? Or is the whole army of them unwittingly slave labour for an ulteriour purpose? Or is the whole thing actually only and merely a gargantuan Sandbox primarily for all the ungrown people of the world - of whatever age? What I mean is: nothing seems to have changed. Oh, and Mr. Wales, please, next time you are addressing Wikipedians (in India at least) please do not waste half their time with your passport problems. Other people around the world also experience them from time to time - no one usually takes to the Podium with them. PS: I'm sending this off in a hurry so it is not reviewed or edited by me, so basically i disclaim everything i've just said but I do state what I feel. Rgds All. VivekM (talk) 13:51, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

External links

The following are links ejected from the article per WP:ELNO. These may be reintegrated in the article as citations where relevant/required, but please don't leave loose urls lying around. -- Ohc ^¡digame! 04:16, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

• http://www.tribuneindia.com/2010/20100425/spectrum/book1.htm
• http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/books/demogislam/part2.html
• http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?226739
• http://www.forbes.com/global/2009/0112/068.html
• http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/erratica/
• http://www.mumbaimirror.com/index.aspx?page=article&sectid=9&contentid=2009010720090107020604668903cfa1d
• http://www.iwmf.org/article.aspx?id=449&c=narticles

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bachi Karkaria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091118165004/http://www.mumbaimirror.com/index.aspx?page=article&sectid=9&contentid=2009010720090107020604668903cfa1d to http://www.mumbaimirror.com/index.aspx?page=article&sectid=9&contentid=2009010720090107020604668903cfa1d

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:45, 14 September 2017 (UTC)