Talk:Backboard shattering

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Article content

edit

Note that there is content related to backboard shattering in the last three paragraphs of the Notable dunks section of the Slam Dunk article. I would recommend that the Slam Dunk article either point to this article (in a subsection hatnote) with the corresponding material transferred here, or have this article be changed to be a redirect to a subsection of the Slam Dunk article. Any preferences or alternative suggestions? — Myasuda (talk) 20:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I agree (two years later). This seems odd as a freestanding article and would be more appropriate in the Slam dunk article. GreenGlass(talk) 02:35, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Backboard shattering. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:52, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply