Talk:Bad Boy Bubby

Echolalia?

Could Bubby’s condition be properly described as echolalia? Sanderling 02:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC) More like an idiot savant! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.208.220.32 (talk) 11:48, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Taboo subject?

"Bubby became notorious for pushing the boundaries of good taste with its strong scenes featuring violence, incest and atheism amongst other taboo topics." I hardly think that atheism is a "taboo subject". DuncanHill 00:20, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Indeed atheism is a taboo topic, especially within the context of this film which was mainly concerned with blasphemy (I believe the line is "God be a worthless cunt.") The criticism of any religion is that of taboo, more so when it's put so bluntly. The KZA 01:38, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

If violence, incest and atheism are taboo, most films made for (ahem) adults deal with taboo topics. 86.177.102.112 (talk) 13:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bad Boy Bubby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050921035847/http://www.blue-underground.com/movie.php?movie_id=75 to http://www.blue-underground.com/movie.php?movie_id=75
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080327121633/http://eireville.blogspot.com/2005/10/bad-boy-bubby.html to http://eireville.blogspot.com/2005/10/bad-boy-bubby.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:57, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Claims of animal abuse may be false...?

This site [1] claims: "The feral cat killed in the movie was killed humanely by a vet, and not suffocated as depicted in the movie. The same cat was used both when it was alive and after it had been put to sleep. The kitten depicted to be killed later in the movie was not feral, and was not really killed, it was only sedated." 2A00:23C5:FE0C:2100:28B0:6FB0:657F:C199 (talk) 14:19, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Italian?

Does a producer from Italy putting in money partway through production really make this an 'Australian-Italian film'? Money for films often comes from all different sources, particularly today, and it seems off and confusing to me to use that alone to introduce this film as an 'Australian-Italian film.' 180.150.39.36 (talk) 21:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

I think you're right. Sources describe the film as simply "Australian" ([2][3][4][5]), so I've edited accordingly. Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 09:16, 9 April 2021 (UTC)