Talk:Baird Law Office
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Baird Law Office appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 January 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
development
editThis article was started with mostly just info from the National Register's NRIS database. Please find/add more! Try Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL or Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL.
It could possibly be moved to be a section in Heritage Hill State Park, with a redirect from here, if an editor felt that was better. --doncram (talk) 13:52, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
- The article is contradicting itself. Near the beginning it is stated, that the building was moved to its current location in 1960, later it reads that it was moved to the park in 1975. Also, the last paragraph is somewhat redundant to the second. --Matthiasb (talk) 07:02, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for your attention paid. I tried clarifying just now about moves of the building, in this edit. Not sure which redundancy you are referring to. If u mean the architectural features discussed in the last paragraph and also in the first paragraph, I think that came up as the first paragraph is meant as a lede. Lede paragraphs in bigger articles, articles on their way to FA, generally don't have footnotes, and there needs to be the same info elsewhere in the article, with footnotes. If you feel this article should be formatted/written differently, as it is relatively short or for any other reason, please go ahead and edit! --Doncram (talk) 18:07, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- Well I rather try to avoid editing in the English WP when it is more than the correction of a fact or spelling error since I feel not comfortable with my grammar.
- I tried to refer that the beginning is stating:
- The small one-story building--just 16 x 30 feet (9.1 m) in size--sports a portico with four columns, two with Ionic capitals.
- while the end repeats in almost the same wording
- Architectural details include that the building a portico with four columns, the center two having Ionic capitals and being round fluted.
- The underlined parts of the sentences are baasically the same. So I removed it in the beginning. Feel free to revert me and do it better. --Matthiasb (talk) 20:35, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for your attention paid. I tried clarifying just now about moves of the building, in this edit. Not sure which redundancy you are referring to. If u mean the architectural features discussed in the last paragraph and also in the first paragraph, I think that came up as the first paragraph is meant as a lede. Lede paragraphs in bigger articles, articles on their way to FA, generally don't have footnotes, and there needs to be the same info elsewhere in the article, with footnotes. If you feel this article should be formatted/written differently, as it is relatively short or for any other reason, please go ahead and edit! --Doncram (talk) 18:07, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Baird Law Office. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101212063233/http://heritagehillgb.org/tour/growing/baird to http://www.heritagehillgb.org/tour/growing/baird
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:51, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Baird Law Office. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110505142505/http://www.ci.green-bay.wi.us/mayors_past/mayor_baird.html to http://www.ci.green-bay.wi.us/mayors_past/mayor_baird.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:30, 13 July 2017 (UTC)