Talk:Bangladesh/Archive 8
This is an archive of past discussions about Bangladesh. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2018 and 22 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alejandrosalva. Peer reviewers: Nikki048.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:16, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Bias and poor quality
Where are the WikiProject Bangladesh editors? This article has degraded to a very poor quality. My attempts to update and improve the article are being reversed by one editor who keeps content about Ramayana, Mahabharata and Hindu nationalist issues. Is this article being administered by pro-Hindutva Wikipedians?--JamesWittenhall40 (talk) 01:55, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: @Dilbaggg:, Can you please explain this revertion? I was following JamesWittenhall40's edits and found nothing that we cannot keep good faith on them. Your reversion also goes against WP:STATUSQUO. This is insane that anyone just reverted all the intermediate edits, updates and bug fixes only to restore an image(!). (For this case, see, WP:REVONLY) However, JamesWittenhall40, Civility is part of Wikipedia's code of conduct and one of its five pillars and one should avoid personal attacks. — Meghmollar2017 (UTC) — 14:38, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:07, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Undue use of FutureHealthSystem sources
Source seems to be used in excess Greatder (talk) 05:07, 18 February 2022 (UTC) ==
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
==
Many poor edits are made. Many information comes from News Media or other Unreliable Sources.
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 22:41, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
please change it to extended protection
- Not done: requests for increases to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Cannolis (talk) 23:05, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 10 April 2022
This edit request to Bangladesh has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Water area percentage is 12.319816785666173% not 6.4% 103.133.143.54 (talk) 16:26, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. MadGuy7023 (talk) 16:40, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 29 May 2022
This edit request to Bangladesh has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change ‘Bangladesh is a South Asian country’ to ‘Bangladesh is a South-East Asian country’ because basically it’s actually South-East Asian. Fledgecannon (talk) 14:19, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
TruthEMoment Fledgecannon (talk) 14:20, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:23, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:21, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Rokou
Semi-protected edit request on 5 September 2022
This edit request to Bangladesh has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Bangladesh Environment Conservation Act was enacted in 1995. The government has designated several regions as Ecologically Critical Areas, including wetlands, forests, and rivers. The Sundarbans tiger project and the Bangladesh Bear Project are among the key initiatives to strengthen conservation.[1] And now, The Court of Sessions in Bangladesh has jurisdiction over cases involving the unlawful killing of tigers and elephants.[2] 27.147.202.163 (talk) 22:51, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
bearprojectbd.weebly.com
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ "Wildlife laws in Bangladesh – Everything you need to know in 2022". Tahmidurrahman.com. Retrieved 2022-09-06.
- source not reliable — Meghmollar2017 (UTC) — 07:16, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Per Capita Income
This edit request to Bangladesh has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hi,
Based on the estimated FY2022 GDP (Nominal and PPP), the Per Capita Income (Nominal and PPP) are not shown correctly. The country ranking is not correct either! Please make the necessary corrections! Thanks. Mmkhan.mmk (talk) 05:40, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Not done : Figures are given that of IMF which is widely accepted, used in most articles under economics related articles and most reliable source based on Consensus. You can check it by yourself. Assume good faith and be Civil to the fellow editors. Sneha04 💬 12:36, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Per capita 2591 usd correction this immedietly Ayubul islam (talk) 18:28, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, below listed the Nominal Per Capita Income and the Standing for Bangladesh, Nepal and India. While Bangladesh's Per Capita is above Nepal (twice as much) and India, Bangladesh's standing is below them. When will you please correct them? Thanks.
Bangladesh: $2520 162th Nepal: $1236 158th India: $2515 142th Mmkhan.mmk (talk) 06:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
History trim
The history section, and the lead, are so immensely large, that both have become unreadable. Needs a massive trim. I am not an expert on the history of the region so I cannot do so. Someone with knowledge over the matter needs to trim the excess and transfer it to the History of Bangladesh article. I have tried formatting some of the other sections across the article. Stuntneare (talk) 10:45, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
The Country ranking by GDP and Per Capita Income is wrong
Hi, below listed the Nominal Per Capita Income and the Standing for Bangladesh, Nepal and India. While Bangladesh's Per Capita is above Nepal (twice as much) and India, Bangladesh's standing is below them. When will you please correct them? Thanks.
Bangladesh: $2520 162th Nepal: $1236 158th India: $2515 142th Mmkhan.mmk (talk) 06:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC) Mmkhan.mmk (talk) 20:39, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Data of natural gas prices
If anyone has good monthly or daily data points of natural gas prices in bangledesh I could make a dope graph. Import spot prices / import futures contract prices/ domestic production prices. --Wikideas1 (talk) 09:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Taslima Nasreen
We should add Taslima Nasreen in the examples of Human rights activists as well as Feminist writers and all other things she stands for Nlivataye (talk) 14:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Human trafficking
Rank in the globe is 192 103.170.47.8 (talk) 05:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Official Website
Bangladesh have a government portal which is www.bangladesh.gov.bd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NUR A ALAM NAYON (talk • contribs) 14:19, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- @NUR A ALAM NAYON: This is a "government website", not a "country website". See documentation for Template:Infobox country. — Meghmollar2017 (UTC) — 17:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Requesting Edit
In the Etymology section, does not the source state that the sanskrit is "deśa" , not "desha"?
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E0%A4%A6%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%B6#Sanskrit 98.59.80.64 (talk) 13:05, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:51, 19 November 2022 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Bangladesh — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeNeroAl (talk • contribs) 13:45, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 9 March 2023
This edit request to Bangladesh has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
DeNeroAl (talk) 13:44, 9 March 2023 (UTC) GDP per capita " nominal: of Bangladesh now 3182$.
Bangladesh's GDP is currently over 525 billion US dollars, making it the 29th largest economy in the worldhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Bangladesh
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 14:20, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:38, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
the official name of Bangladesh
it says that there official name is the people's republic of Bangladesh when it is a parliamentary republic. a peoples republic refers to a communist or authoritarian state and was wondering could this be looked into it needs to be cited and should be looked into. thanks King ryker (talk) 19:31, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- The government and constitution of Bangladesh itself uses the name "People's Republic of Bangladesh". OkLs (talk) 02:31, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Emblem
Someone please revert the emblem to the old Golden one. The green one isnt the main emblem. Government websites like the one below swhos the golden one as the national emblem, not the green one.
http://bangladeshembassy.nl/national-emblem/ GucciNuzayer (talk) 22:19, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Done! I fixed it! -- Liberty Pedia (talk) 11:10, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Not Done! My edits were reverted by vandals on two separate occasions! -- Liberty Pedia (talk) 11:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:42, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
বরিশাইল্লা মনু এখন গ্রামে। 116.58.203.20 (talk) 14:02, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
assalamu alaikum amader gaibanda fulshorir thanar shonnashir chore nodi vagtese to amader akta onorod je amader ai nodir pas deye Jodi poro jaygata boldar mere dewa hoito tahole amader onek upokar hoto 2400:C600:343D:97BA:1:0:254B:D7 (talk) 00:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 30 April 2023
This edit request to Bangladesh has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In "History" under "atrocities" change "intellectuas" to "intellectuals". 2A02:A467:F771:1:2469:E5BD:D0E:B025 (talk) 09:53, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Bad English Edit
"Bangladesh also a part of the next eleven economies. " sounds like (Personal attack removed). add the is 47.149.237.223 (talk) 14:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Watch the personal attacks, IP, that language is not welcome here. I'll review the section, I don't think adding "is" is all that's required here. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:18, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Removing informations without adequate reasoning
Solomon The Magnifico today had removed some of the information that gives a basic idea about economic situation and military power in the region. The information were removed without stating the actual reason rather than just stating it's too long for him to read. I would like to take the board and community make their standpoints before removing these informations. Imamul Ifaz (talk) 09:54, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- Your edits are excessively prolonging the introduction of this article. You are trying to portray Bangladesh as some kind of a global superpower with a special paramilitary. As I mentioned to you in my talk page, you insist on mentioning the paramilitary in the lede. The paramilitary forces serve as auxiliary police and military reserve forces. Hence, their importance is not so high. Other countries like India, Pakistan, China, Thailand, Mexico and the United States also have very large paramilitary forces, but there is nothing special about it. Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 12:42, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- I mentioned paramilitary police more to highlight Bangladesh's global achievement rather than their importance. If I thought Bangladesh was a superpower I wouldn't use the specific term "middle-power" in my edit. And If you think I have to edit on your tradition like this page has this that page has that then you are wrong. I am and independent editor. I have rights to edit pages from trustable sources. Imamul Ifaz (talk) 19:18, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- As per WP:LEAD, the lead should summarize the article. There is only one reference to 'paramilitary' in the entire article, which refers to the militias of 1971. You are trying to insert something which the article does not even talk about. Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 22:24, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- Again, you are bragging the same argument of paramilitary not having any importance in the country's defence line. Although I have said before that it has nothing do with importance rather than having a achivement. Bangladesh is relatively a small country with barely any achivement in the world platform. This achivement is one of the few of them shows Bangladesh's ability to portray themselves. As per WP:LEAD, the lead should establish context, explain why the topic is notable. So it's important Imamul Ifaz (talk) 08:03, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- No, I'm quoting to you the very first sentence of WP:LEAD, which is that "In Wikipedia, the lead section is an introduction to an article and a summary of its most important contents." The article has a single reference to the term 'paramilitary'; in comparison, the military has an entire sub-section devoted to it. Notability is not the issue here. When people think of Bangladesh, they don't think about its paramilitary. First, you have to explain what you mean by paramilitary, then we have to see if the content is relevant for Wikipedia and then we can try to understand what you are trying to say. My hunch is that you are referring to the Bangladesh Ansar and Village Defence Party among other organizations. So in that context, please see that India does not mention the Indo-Tibetan Border Police and Pakistan does not mention the Pakistan Rangers in the lede. Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 08:56, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- let's come to a mutual agreement here. I am removing the paramilitary section if you think it's so much less important to mention. But the other sections may remain, for the mutual consideration. Imamul Ifaz (talk) 12:14, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- No, I'm quoting to you the very first sentence of WP:LEAD, which is that "In Wikipedia, the lead section is an introduction to an article and a summary of its most important contents." The article has a single reference to the term 'paramilitary'; in comparison, the military has an entire sub-section devoted to it. Notability is not the issue here. When people think of Bangladesh, they don't think about its paramilitary. First, you have to explain what you mean by paramilitary, then we have to see if the content is relevant for Wikipedia and then we can try to understand what you are trying to say. My hunch is that you are referring to the Bangladesh Ansar and Village Defence Party among other organizations. So in that context, please see that India does not mention the Indo-Tibetan Border Police and Pakistan does not mention the Pakistan Rangers in the lede. Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 08:56, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Again, you are bragging the same argument of paramilitary not having any importance in the country's defence line. Although I have said before that it has nothing do with importance rather than having a achivement. Bangladesh is relatively a small country with barely any achivement in the world platform. This achivement is one of the few of them shows Bangladesh's ability to portray themselves. As per WP:LEAD, the lead should establish context, explain why the topic is notable. So it's important Imamul Ifaz (talk) 08:03, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- As per WP:LEAD, the lead should summarize the article. There is only one reference to 'paramilitary' in the entire article, which refers to the militias of 1971. You are trying to insert something which the article does not even talk about. Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 22:24, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- I mentioned paramilitary police more to highlight Bangladesh's global achievement rather than their importance. If I thought Bangladesh was a superpower I wouldn't use the specific term "middle-power" in my edit. And If you think I have to edit on your tradition like this page has this that page has that then you are wrong. I am and independent editor. I have rights to edit pages from trustable sources. Imamul Ifaz (talk) 19:18, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- Your edits show a lack of understanding of policies and guidelines, one that applies here is WP:LEAD. Also, do you happen to be using a LLM such as ChatGPT or Google Bard? QuicoleJR (talk) 16:35, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- I can ask you the same question cause you happen to be using a LLM such as ChatGPT or Google Bard. This is offensive and disrespectful to suspect someone using LLM without any proof. Imamul Ifaz (talk) 19:14, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- Did you just tell me I am using an LLM to write these? I am not, I assure you. Also, the main reason I asked was to confirm or deny the accusations of others towards you at WP:ANI. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:35, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- That has been also a false accusation as the user also didn't have any proof for such aligation. He used this to play his other aligations he had against me. Imamul Ifaz (talk) 07:44, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Did you just tell me I am using an LLM to write these? I am not, I assure you. Also, the main reason I asked was to confirm or deny the accusations of others towards you at WP:ANI. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:35, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- I can ask you the same question cause you happen to be using a LLM such as ChatGPT or Google Bard. This is offensive and disrespectful to suspect someone using LLM without any proof. Imamul Ifaz (talk) 19:14, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Lead
As Alalch E. suggests in his revert of Imamul Ifaz, the lead section in Germany is a good example to follow. Germany has 4 paragraphs. Imamul is insisting on 6 paragraphs, and is adding even more information which is not necessary nor relevant.
Imamul needs to understand that the lead is not a nationalistic commentary, but a way for people around the world to understand Bangladesh in the most concise way possible. Concise, but has to be informative too. Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 09:13, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- I could also argue with the lead section of China or India being a good example of how a intro of a country should be. And the necessity of a information is not a personal opinion it is a debate with the whole community. As you said, people around the world to understand Bangladesh in the most concise way possible is what my point is. we need to describe Bangladesh in simple and broad way possible to let the audience know it's current situation in the world community.
- @Alalch E. is not the representative of Bangladesh. I will not be convinced by his particular argument as he has been accused of being biased before. Imamul Ifaz (talk) 12:04, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- OK. See WP:CONSENSUS. The consensus is not in your favor right now. QuicoleJR (talk) 12:33, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Only 3 person cannot decide it. WP:CONSENSUS also stated that grouping up against a user and pushing your own opinion on that person is not allowed. I would like you to read WP:Wikihounding, because thats what you three are doing right now. I will revert it back. You are no one to push your agenda on me. I have rights to share knowledge in wikipedia. Imamul Ifaz (talk) 15:30, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- 1. Consensus can most certainly be decided by three editors in cases like this.
- 2. I am not wikihounding you, as I am not following you from discussion to discussion to oppose you.
- QuicoleJR (talk) 15:43, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Only 3 person cannot decide it. WP:CONSENSUS also stated that grouping up against a user and pushing your own opinion on that person is not allowed. I would like you to read WP:Wikihounding, because thats what you three are doing right now. I will revert it back. You are no one to push your agenda on me. I have rights to share knowledge in wikipedia. Imamul Ifaz (talk) 15:30, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Did you count the number of paragraphs in India and China? They have four paragraphs too, like Germany. You need to recognize that six long paragraphs defeats the purpose, especially if you include everything in the intro. Please respect WP:LEAD. Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 16:38, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- OK. See WP:CONSENSUS. The consensus is not in your favor right now. QuicoleJR (talk) 12:33, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Images
In this edit, @Imamul Ifaz claimed an image from 2015 was more recent than the one he replaced (taken in 2022). He is clearly giving false justifications in his edit summaries to game the system. This is extremely disingenuous. Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 07:50, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- Nauka baich is a sport not a festival. Eid is a festival read Eid al-Fitr and Nouka Baich. Also there is no claim North South University is the largest university of Bangladesh. How did you even come up with that.
- And Dargah doesn't represent a country's religion. It could be part of a separate section of Islam. Imamul Ifaz (talk) 09:19, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- An institute is an organization that is set up to do a particular type of work, especially research or teaching. Institutes can be public or private, and they can be large or small. Some common types of institutes include:
- Research institutes, which conduct research in a particular field
- Educational institutes, which provide education in a particular field
- Professional institutes, which provide training and support for professionals in a particular field
- Cultural institutes, which promote and preserve a particular culture
- Social institutes, which address social problems
- I believe who doesn't have a basic English knowledge should be banned from editing wikipedia. @Worldbruce I hope you see this. Imamul Ifaz (talk) 09:24, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- That is a personal attack and if @Worldbruce (who is biased against me) condones this, that would be very unfortunate. Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 10:31, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- You don't know the meaning of a basic English word "institute" and accused me of misusing the word. It has nothing to do with personal attack. You are doing Argument from ignorance
- WP:VAND
- WP:Wikihounding Argument from ignorance is not allowed in wikipedia. @QuicoleJR why are you quite on this?
- WP:VAND
- Imamul Ifaz (talk) 11:51, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- Why did you feel the need to get me involved? QuicoleJR (talk) 14:04, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- I believe you and @Alalch E. are very supportive towards him. Im suspecting these 3 are the same accounts. Imamul Ifaz (talk) 17:30, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- Sockpuppetry is a severe accusation. It should never be made without evidence. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:53, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- I believe you and @Alalch E. are very supportive towards him. Im suspecting these 3 are the same accounts. Imamul Ifaz (talk) 17:30, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- I said North South University is a university, not an institute. Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 14:37, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- Why did you feel the need to get me involved? QuicoleJR (talk) 14:04, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- You don't know the meaning of a basic English word "institute" and accused me of misusing the word. It has nothing to do with personal attack. You are doing Argument from ignorance
- That is a personal attack and if @Worldbruce (who is biased against me) condones this, that would be very unfortunate. Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 10:31, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Bangladesh
Bangladesh has the longest sea beach in the world. 103.137.108.163 (talk) 15:34, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Done! -- Liberty Pedia (talk) 11:17, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Not Done! My edits were reverted by vandals on two separate occasions! -- Liberty Pedia (talk) 11:51, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Education
I am editing the article Bangladesh section is Education,
"Students who pass the PEC examination proceed to secondary or matriculation training, culminating in the SSC examination.
[1]" It is wrong information because it should say: "Students who pass the JSC (Junior School Certificate) examination proceed to secondary or matriculation training, culminating in the SSC examination." so I Changed the information, if i am wrong feel free to edit.
[2] Riidthecinnamon (talk) 03:16, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
References
- ^ T. Neville Postlethwaite (1988). The Encyclopedia of Comparative Education and National Systems of Education. Pergamon Press. p. 130. ISBN 978-0-08-030853-1.
- ^ T. Neville Postlethwaite (1988). The Encyclopedia of Comparative Education and National Systems of Education. Pergamon Press. p. 130. ISBN 978-0-08-030853-1.
GDP 2023 Estimation
IMF has forecasted the GDP of Bangladesh for FY 23/24 but the current article is backdated as it is showing the 2022 estimation which is 460$ billion dollars but it should be 486$ billion dollars as of the current estimation. So I want to request edit on this topic as I myself cannot edit it Sifat1765 (talk) 09:24, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Captions of the National Anthem
The Bangladesh National Anthem does not have captions as of now. Could someone add it. 116.206.253.163 (talk) 12:24, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 2 January 2024
This edit request to Bangladesh has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please allow me to edit this page.Thanks 82.167.81.57 (talk) 12:54, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: requests for decreases to the page protection level should be directed to the protecting admin or to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection if the protecting admin is not active or has declined the request. M.Bitton (talk) 13:56, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Test edits on GDP
I dont understand why people here keep on editing GDP either outdated 2023 figure or overestimated by outdated projections. IMF never published erroneous figures so stop the urge of editing it. I felt sorry for people believing high GDP figures reflects the status of their economy. Maoylord (talk) 12:18, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Government type in infobox
Hi Nurusa101, Yoshi24517 and Gråbergs Gråa Sång, it was HapHaxion who added the description a couple of days ago. It was removed later by Nurusa101. HapHaxion re-added and expanded the bit a couple of hours ago. Since then there have been several reverts. I am not involved myself, could you please discuss it? soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:34, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- The edit was unnecessary and doesnt follow the conventions of this encylcopdia. Other countries that are described as "becoming autocratic" are not marked as such like Hungary, Pakistan, Algeria, Tunisia, India , etc and this principle must be applied to this page as well Nurusa101 (talk) 20:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, my reaction was TBH mostly to the cite-error and apparent removal of sources. Looking at the context again, it seems the infobox "Unitary parliamentary republic under an authoritarian state" does not match current article content, and the refs in the infobox seems very recent. So, I'm not wedded to "my" version. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- So should we revert back to Unitary Parlimentary Republic? Nurusa101 (talk) 20:43, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- I've done so. Infobox (at least this part of it) should not deviate from article content, it's for simple uncontroversial stuff, hopefully sourced in the article already. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:53, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thaanks!! Nurusa101 (talk) 22:24, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- I also want anyone to know that tries to change the government type without consensus from here on out, it will be marked as vandalism after warnings. Nurusa101 (talk) 01:58, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thaanks!! Nurusa101 (talk) 22:24, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- I've done so. Infobox (at least this part of it) should not deviate from article content, it's for simple uncontroversial stuff, hopefully sourced in the article already. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:53, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- So should we revert back to Unitary Parlimentary Republic? Nurusa101 (talk) 20:43, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- The Democratic backsliding is easily sourced [1].. it should be in the article somewhere..... as this place is generally the example of democratic backsliding as of late. Since 2014 "IEDA has marks Bangladesh as authoritarian regime".[2]. Best comeup with something or others will.Moxy- 03:02, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Democratic Backsliding is not an authoritarian regime, I also want to add that the Economist classifies Bangladesh as a hybrid regime as does freedom house . I agree we should add it but not under government type. Nurusa101 (talk) 21:39, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Gallup survey and the census
@Soetermans @Yung Yohan I started a discussion on the user page of yung yohan but this seems to be a better place.
Both of you guys are messing with the 2022 census results and combining it with a 2015 survey which doesn't even mention the 86% figure for islam as gallup only talks about religious, not religious and atheist so why remove the 91% figure for those who said they were muslim in the 2022 census and make it 86% muslim when the 2015 gallup survey doesn't even mention islam?
Inteqaam (talk) 10:27, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- you can change islam back to 90% as it is mentioned in 2022 Census Yung Yohan (talk) 12:34, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- 91% Muslim in Bangladesh 2402:B400:4468:EAE5:0:0:305A:36D9 (talk) 14:45, 29 January 2024 (UTC)