Talk:Barbados–Canada relations
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To be integrated.
editBarbados has outlined some of the industries possibly to be opened up to Canada under CARIBCAN.
Merging content from High commission article
editWhen merging I believe more important info should be merged not every single piece of info like address, list of non notable ambassadors. otherwise the article on bilateral relations places WP:UNDUE weight on the High Commission. Typically in a bilateral article a short description of the main achievements of the embassy may be included but not a full blown description. the outcome of the deletion discussion did not mean copy all content into another article. LibStar (talk) 03:06, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- and when the high commission section is much longer than history it really places WP:UNDUE weight to it. LibStar (talk) 03:09, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- HENCE why it was in its own article. CaribDigita (talk) 03:10, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- the outcome of the AfD meant that the high commission did not merit its own article. LibStar (talk) 03:11, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- True as it may be, the information is relevant to Barbados and Canada. As to the state of those diplomatic and political relations. CaribDigita (talk) 03:27, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- the outcome of the AfD meant that the high commission did not merit its own article. LibStar (talk) 03:11, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- HENCE why it was in its own article. CaribDigita (talk) 03:10, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- and when the high commission section is much longer than history it really places WP:UNDUE weight to it. LibStar (talk) 03:09, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
I don't think addresses of individual embassies are relevant to bilateral relations articles. and we don't put names of current or former ambassadors unless notable. LibStar (talk) 03:31, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Barbados–Canada relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070212111423/http://www.treaty-accord.gc.ca:80/ViewTreaty.asp?Treaty_ID=104967 to http://www.treaty-accord.gc.ca/ViewTreaty.asp?Treaty_ID=104967
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)