Talk:Battle of Bow Street

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Military history: South Pacific / British / European / North America / United States / World War I C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War I task force

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Whistle#Fields and usages|police whistles]] The anchor (#Fields and usages) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Rating for Mil Hist project

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have completed the B class checklist for the Military History project and have rated this article a Start class. This is because the article does not quite qualify as a B class and because the mil hist project does not use a C class rating. However, in my opinion the article is close to a B - it just lacks for supporting materials. As such this article could probably be improved by adding some sort of illustrative material, e.g. a picture, or diagram, or infobox.

Further improvements might be the addition of a See also and External links sections, as well as possibly a separate Notes and References sections - there is probably no need to include the full name of the reference in the in line citation. For example the full name could be included in the references section, whilst the in line citation might simply say 'Fido & Skinner 1999, p. 17'. This is just a personal preference, however, and I don't think that this would hold it back from a B class rating.

Just a few ideas. Should you wish to have the article re-assessed for the military history project, please go to WP:MHA and add it to the list. Hope this helps. AustralianRupert (talk) 14:49, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic