Talk:Battle of Wörth

Wœrth, Woerth, Wörth

The place is called "Wörth" in German. English speakers who can't manage umlauts transliterate this as "Woerth". "Wœrth" strikes me as weird, there must be very few people who would write it like this. I suggest changing the name to "Wörth", once I am confident I know how to do this without breaking an inbound link. Maproom (talk) 19:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I've been reading this and I agree. Every source I see has it as Wörth. Maybe I'll bring this up soon --Banime (talk) 19:45, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

I've moved the article. If you have any problems or questions, we can discuss it here. --Banime (talk) 19:56, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Designation

The German III army – should this be the Prussian III Army? Sca (talk) 17:30, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

'Mac-Mahon'

Is there a reason Mac-Mahon is hyphenated? See Patrice de MacMahon, Duke of Magenta. Sca (talk) 17:42, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Wörth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051217020440/http://woerth-en-alsace.com:80/franc/Presentatmusee.htm to http://woerth-en-alsace.com/franc/Presentatmusee.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Short inline citations need to be supported by long citations in the References section

at 16:05 on 5 June 2020 I made request on the talk page of user:Wkloot requesting (as a WP:CHALLENGE) that (s)he provide long citations to support the short citations (s)he add with a series of edits on 19 February 2019‎. As [user:Wkloot]] to date has not provided these long citations I am going to revert the edits. Under WP:BURDEN the inline citations should not be reinserted unless they are supported with sources in the References section with the information requested in WP:CITE -- PBS (talk) 16:33, 30 June 2020 (UTC)