Talk:Bear (novel)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bear (novel) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Bear (novel) has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 13, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from Bear (novel) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 February 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
removal of category
editI didn't add the article to Category:Obscenity controversies in literature because I hadn't come across that category, but I don't understand why it was removed. The article demonstrates that the book is considered one of the most controversial in Canadian literary history. And it's about (among other things) a woman having sex with a bear. The controversy isn't about.... corrupt politicians or the banking crisis or residential schools or climate change. It's about sex, and what is permissible in literature ("art") versus pornography ("smut"). Carbon Caryatid (talk) 11:22, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bear (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161010211518/http://hpcanpub.mcmaster.ca/case-study/marian-engel-life-writing to http://hpcanpub.mcmaster.ca/case-study/marian-engel-life-writing
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:50, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Unreliable source tag
edit@Just kei:, could you clarify the tag you added in this edit? Right now, the tag implies that New/ELC is unreliable. Is this the case? Or is it more an issue with how the source material is represented? Thanks, The Interior (Talk) 15:35, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
New article in The Guardian
editThere's a new article about the novel in The Guardian today, marking the fact that a new issue of the book has been released: Animal attraction: Bear, the controversial story of one woman’s sexual awakening JezGrove (talk) 12:17, 9 April 2021 (UTC)