Talk:Bear (novel)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Katolophyromai (talk · contribs) 01:09, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

I just went through and reviewed the article and it meets all the criteria, so I am passing it now. I just want to say that I can still hardly believe that this is a even real book that someone actually managed to get published, but I checked out the sources and they are real and legitimate. I guess I will just never understand some people... --Katolophyromai (talk) 01:09, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·