A fact from Bears and Man appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 February 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Continuing the discussion at Template:Did you know nominations/Bears and Man. The entity "Wilderness Cinegraphic" was removed from the infobox "studio" field, on the grounds that it is not an established studio. While I agree with this, and can't offer any illumination as to the exact nature of W.C., I believe it should be included in the infobox as a "statement of responsibility" (see Cataloging), i.e. a potential search term for someone searching the topic. The NFB have given credit to this entity, so I think we should as well. From my experience in the film world, it's likely this is a personal company for Schmalz, and may not have even had an office. However, we do list these "personal" production companies as "studios" in practice, for instance "A Band Apart" is Quentin Tarantino's personal outfit, but gets billing alongside Miramax in the studio field in his articles (see Inglourious Basterds). So, we can simply include it here, talk to WikiProject Film about getting the "studio" parameter either expanded to include production companies, or strictly limited to proper "studios" (that might be difficult as I don't know of a proper definition), or exclude it. The Interior(Talk)04:51, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
