Talk:Beating retreat
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Beating retreat article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI would dispute the premise of this article. Beating the Retreat seems to be a British ceremony which is performed by not only India but also by England and Australia. It can probably be found in the military of any Commonwealth country. I'm not saying that the facts are incorrect, simply that the topic is far broader than is presented here and it seems incorrect to have this page documenting only the Indian use. --Lod 02:43, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
- I agree. But this particular event is perhaps the most important and publicised event of all of them. --Deepak|वार्ता 07:13, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
- Perhaps we could add sections which talks about such a ceremony in other parts of the world. We have seperate topics for Changing of guards at London, Edinburgh Military Tatoo etc. A change of the title is also an okay move. 203.91.193.5 06:35, 14 February 2006 (UTC)Qmsarge203.91.193.5 06:35, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- Beating Retreat or Beating The Retreat I can confirm is a British Military Parade as well, and I think this article should be expanded to include that. The B.R. parade in London on Horse Guards Parade, is normally run for two days, once a year and the Salute is taken by a member of the Royal Family. 23rd April 2006
- I would not necessarily agree that the Indian version is the most important of them all - and even if it were, the other Commonwealth countries should still be mentioned. Campdavid 18:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- At the very least the name of the article should be changed to Beating Retreat Ceremony in India. I think Deepak Gupta is incorrect in saying that the Indian version is the most important one. I would guess that the most important and elaborate event must indeed be the Mother version, the British one. Before posting articles or stating opinions emphatically, it would be a good idea to do some research. SK June 24 2006.
- I feel the page has been edited well. It now just mentions that Beating Retreat is a Military ceremony, and below that the Indian ceremony has been explained. It would be nice if UK and/or any other commonwealth nation put down their versions too.
I have edited the article now such that the British version appears at the top, but other versions are mentioned in the same detail as before under sub-titles of their own country. This approach seemed best fitting as the tradition is a British one, which is still a very public event in the UK, and as the oldest should take precidence in the article. Others have been left in the order that they were added by other users. The Picture used in the article at present is of British Guards on the Mall, and again, this is justified by the fact that the general info on the parade is under the British section. Philip.t.day (talk) 16:06, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
After further editing, there are more images and the British Section is much more large. Other commetns on this talk page may now be out of date. Philip.t.day (talk) 18:15, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Form of the ceremony
editThe article doesn't actually describe what goes on in the ceremony. Also, a bit more on its historical origins wrt the rest of Europe (day's end ceremonies are by no means unique to the UK) could be useful. Grosser Zapfenstreich and so on are all essentially the same with a few pieces of music, some kind of formal signal and/or hymn part etc., i.e. it is nothing more than a form of tattoo (though you'll need sources :D) 118.90.35.155 (talk) 13:18, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned references in Beating Retreat
editI check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Beating Retreat's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "NYT":
- From Wagah border ceremony: Frank Jacobs (July 3, 2012). "Peacocks at Sunset". Opinionator: Borderlines. The New York Times. Retrieved July 15, 2012.
- From Indian Air Force: Weisman, Steven R. (5 June 1987). "India Airlifts Aid to Tamil Rebels". The New York Times. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
Reference named "guardian":
- From Wagah border ceremony: Khaleeli, Homa (1 November 2010). "Goodbye to the ceremony of silly walks between India and Pakistan". The Guardian. Retrieved 14 November 2011.
- From Commonwealth of Nations: Watt, Nicholas (29 October 2011). "Commonwealth leaders under fire for refusing to publish human rights report". The Guardian. Retrieved 29 October 2011.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Beating Retreat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110605021754/http://www.army.mod.uk/documents/general/cerem_guard_change.pdf to http://www.army.mod.uk/documents/general/cerem_guard_change.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Beating Retreat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060925214515/http://www.royalmarinesbands.co.uk/reference/FS_beating_retreat.htm to http://www.royalmarinesbands.co.uk/reference/FS_beating_retreat.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312082320/http://www.awm.gov.au/beatretreat/history.htm to http://www.awm.gov.au/beatretreat/history.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:59, 16 July 2017 (UTC)