Talk:Beauty and the Beast
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Europe, France section
edit"like in Beaumont's version, it is not mentioned that the protagonist's sisters are punished at the end. " Nothing in the section on Beaumont mentions any punishment. 84.71.45.82 (talk) 16:32, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Wrong Villeneuve plot
editHello
The Villeneuve's plot section is false, perhaps a movie adaptation plot, or Vandalism. Last good Villeneuve's plot is 14 July 2020 , heavily altered by User:Harry Vallet : [see here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beauty_and_the_Beast&type=revision&diff=970115033&oldid=967697656 ].
You can read real Villeneuve plot at de.wiki or it.wiki
Regards --2A02:8428:EAC:DC01:206B:E500:6BBA:4237 (talk) 02:32, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- but isn't the plot too long? or is that just me? Anthony2106 (talk) 10:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed that it's Very detailed, I've tried trimming it down a bit again.
- Fireant314 (talk) Fireant314 (talk) 17:16, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Added summary section
editThis is a longer edit so let me know if it doesn't fit please!
Thought process: Villenveue's version is referenced (non-Wiki meaning [/jk]) as a base to explain the other versions, but it's very long and has intricate descriptions even after I trimmed it down.
A summary makes it easier for people to read quickly if they're unfamiliar with the fairy tale at all, which is I think what the article's for. I tried to keep the story elements while not being specific.
(This line said as a joke, tl;dr I did the thing you do with fairy tales where they're abridged to fit purposes! \o/ )
Thank you. ~ Fireant314 (talk) 19:43, 20 October 2024 (UTC)