| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Belapur Fort article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Belapur Fort was a Warfare good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_without_national_boundaries.svg)
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Belapur Fort/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
- Starting GAR.Pyrotec (talk) 09:40, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
GAR
editGA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This was one of five Indian Forts submitted for WP:GAR on the same day.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Almost the whole of the article is based on a single newspaper article, whose web link is broken.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- A newspaper article does not provide verification of India's history.
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- This is a building, an archaeological site and a military structure. Information would be expected on the architecture/style of building, its defences, a floor plan / archaeological plans, etc. They are entirely absent.
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- This article was submitted simultaneously with a number of other articles, in WP:good faith, for GAR. This article, and apparently others submitted at the same time, suffer from lack of WP:Verify and breath of scope. They can be fixed given time: there are numerous books on this subject, see [1]. However, in view of the number of articles involved, I don't think that this will be achieved in one week. The article can be resubmitted for GAR once these issues have been addressed; and I'm willing to review it, if required, prior to submission to GAR.Pyrotec (talk) 10:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
