Talk:Bellevue City Hall
Latest comment: 7 years ago by The Rambling Man in topic GA Review
Bellevue City Hall has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 16, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Bellevue City Hall appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 July 2017, and was viewed approximately 625 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Bellevue City Hall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 10:11, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
- Lead is a little brief, in particular the second para, I don't think two sentences is really a paragraph...
- Expanded both paragraphs a bit.
- You could create 450 Bell Terrace as a redirect if it really was a former name.
- Done.
- "incorporation" is piped to a redirect.
- Fixed.
- Shades of overlinking, e.g. "schoolhouse", "hardware store", "air conditioning", "basketball", "car dealership" etc...
- Fixed.
- 11 floors in the infobox but as far as I can tell, only 9 stories mentioned in the prose. Did the renovation add two more floors?
- Fixed, it's actually seven floors, which were reduced from the original nine in the Qwest configuration.
- "a "hub of civic life"" quote needs ref/attribution.
- Added.
- EnergyStar is simply Energy Star.
- Fixed.
- Could find an appropriate sub-cat of Category:Buildings and structures by year of completion.
- Added.
Otherwise not much more to add, a nice piece of work. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:27, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: I believe that addresses everything in your review. SounderBruce 23:35, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
- Good work, it was very close before your modifications, and I've now passed it. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)