Talk:Benjamin Schulte

Latest comment: 6 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review
Good articleBenjamin Schulte has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starBenjamin Schulte is part of the Guam at the 2016 Summer Olympics series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 19, 2018Good article nomineeListed
July 6, 2018Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Benjamin Schulte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:19, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Benjamin Schulte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Benjamin Schulte/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 07:58, 14 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reviewing this as part of a GA sweep. Comments will appear soon. MWright96 (talk) 07:58, 14 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

General

edit
  • All mentions of events such as 50 m and 100 m, 400 m would be better off spelt out as 50 meters for example

Lead

edit

Done Kees08 (Talk)

Early life and education

edit

Olympic career

edit
  • "Schulte decided to refocus and switch from long distance swimming to short distance. " - link long distance swimming
  • "Schulte broke his own national record during the" - wikilink national record to List of Guamanian records in swimming
  • The wikilink for the 2016 Summer Olympics should be at the start of the first sentence of the third paragraph and not at the end of it

International career

edit
  • "with a time of 29.26 to win the gold medal." - 29.26 seconds

Overall a neater piece of work than the other two articles I've reviewed. Just the quibbles above will need addressing. MWright96 (talk) 12:04, 14 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

@MWright96: Done with the comments, let me know if you have more. Thanks! Kees08 (Talk) 06:52, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Reply