Talk:Bev Busson
 | This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I'm just a casual user of Wikipedia so I do not wish to log in, but the Commissioner's name is misspelled: Beverley Busson (LEY) at the end of Beverley. Someone please correct.
- Done --Ibagli (Talk) 03:59, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Beverley Busson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061230085040/http://www.rcmp.ca:80/exec_bios/busson_e.htm to http://www.rcmp.ca/exec_bios/busson_e.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:00, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Beverley Busson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151117022614/http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=da664160-5299-4ffa-9dbe-896df41024a6&k=33350 to http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=da664160-5299-4ffa-9dbe-896df41024a6&k=33350
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rcmp.ca/exec_bios/busson_e.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:18, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Government over reach
editThanks for the work you do for are country as you have served throughout your life, l am really bothered by the control the Prime Minister is putting on us as citizens in saying who we can support. If this is allowed the government could deem any opposition as a threat therefore limiting are rights as citizens to oppose. I am hopefully you see the danger of this passing this type of control and vote against it Thanks Steve Erickson, a Canadian citizen of B.C. 207.148.176.185 (talk) 17:34, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Debate on emergency act
editI am concerned with the content of your debate , as l listen to it your arguments seem like I was listening to the news, or the prime minister. Not that they are always wrong but we’re the facts they presented true. The protesters went there, they thought in there given rights to protesters peacefully for some reason you labeled them as illegal. If they were truly illegal the government would not need extra power to remove them. Did you look into the story behind the flag , but painted them all with the same brush, do you know the meaning behind the symbolism for the Hindu , Buddhist community. I think the guy carrying the flag was saying,, is this the try of government you want Canada to have. I do believe that he should not have been carrying it because what it typically stands for. Do you know the full story behind the guns at the border? The overreach into the bank accounts was enough alone to defeat the motion, it had the potential and almost did to upset the financial stability of Canada. It seem to me that you didn’t put put much thought into your arguments, or check out the truth of them for such a important vote. My hope is that we can learn from the past , our freedoms are way more important than party lines. 207.148.176.57 (talk) 19:59, 25 February 2022 (UTC)