Talk:Beware the Batman

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Consistent vandalism

edit

Just throwing it out there: an anon/sling of IPs has been, and keeps on, adding characters to this page, including the character "Axel Alex". It can be reverted on sight.

There is no DC character named Axel Alex. The villain, real name "Alex Farland", was originally added to List of Batman villains, where his first appearance was said to be in Untold Tales of the Batman. Which doesn't exist. I've removed the name from that page in the past, and noticed it keeps coming up here too. Anons (or one anon) keep adding it. Slap them with a vandalism warning, block them, protect this page to autoconfirmed, do nothing and keep reverting, whatever you want, but this requires action. --Tupka217 (talk) 18:19, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

@Tupka217: No worries, you can request to protect this page as autoconfirmed users can edit this article (semi-protection). --Allen (talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me) 17:33, 11 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Outsiders?

edit

"With the introduction of Metamorpho confirmed and Katana already featuring prominently as a supporting character, we already have three out of the six members who formed the team in "The Brave and the Bold #200" back in 1983." Read more at http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/movienewsandreviews/news/?a=84008#UJPfBQ4qm704rTPi.99 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.107.240.36 (talk) 19:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Layout of character sections

edit

I wonder if, perhaps, the entries under Main characters should be subsections, instead of just a bulleted list — mainly, so that they show up in the TOC? It would make the TOC a little longer, sure, but it's collapsible. And even expanded, it'd still end well before the infobox.

Or perhaps those four entries should simply be subsections of Characters, and don't need the "Main characters" subsection grouping.

Meh. If it was a factual edit or layout repair, I'd just Be Bold. But this comes down to opinion/preference, so I'd rather see if reaction would be positive or negative (or indifferent). Thoughts? (Or, if you like the idea, Feel Free™.) – FeRD_NYC (talk) 18:31, 17 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

When I revamped the character section layout, I did so with an eye to the layout of the Specatcular Spider-Man animated series article. It had to handle many characters- so many that it created a separate page devoted to the characters that appeared in that show. I predict this will happen to this article over time, so for now, I highly encourage you and other editors to hold off on revamping the character section again. Instead, elaborate on each character entry as much as possible. When these become too large, a separate page can be devoted to characters that appeared in Beware the Batman.--Cast (talk) 19:02, 22 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

New “Beware The Batman” Not On Cartoon Network January 2014 Schedule

edit

http://www.worldsfinestonline.com/2014/01/new-beware-the-batman-not-on-cartoon-network-january-2014-schedule/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.107.240.36 (talk) 21:07, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Added to the lead - thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 05:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

'Beware the Batman: Season 1, Part 1' WBShop Exclusive Blu-ray

edit

The first 13 episodes of the CGI animated series head to Blu-ray in February, and they're only available directly from Warner. http://www.wbshop.com/product/code/1000485789.do?AID=10501819&PID=3594900&ref=CJP — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.92.131.107 (talk) 01:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

New “Beware The Batman” Episodes Not On Cartoon Network March 2014 Schedule

edit

http://www.worldsfinestonline.com/2014/02/new-beware-the-batman-episodes-not-on-cartoon-network-march-2014-schedule/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.107.240.36 (talk) 21:46, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

CARTOON NETWORK 2014-2015 Schedule Reveals BEWARE THE BATMAN Missing, No New DC Shows

edit

http://www.newsarama.com/20535-cartoon-network-2014-2015-schedule-reveals-beware-the-batman-cancelled-no-new-dc-shows.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.107.240.36 (talk) 19:36, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

'Beware the Batman' Unaired Episodes Debut on New Zealand TV

edit

http://www.theouthousers.com/index.php/news/126758-beware-the-batman-unaired-episodes-debut-on-new-zealand-tv.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.107.240.36 (talk) 19:47, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Amazon Takes Exclusive U.K. Rights to 'Beware the Batman'

edit

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/amazon-uk-takes-beware-batman-696705 Its Prime Instant Video service in Britain for the first time offers a series aimed at young adults‎ before it airs on TV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.107.240.36 (talk) 20:20, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

BEWARE THE BATMAN Nominated for Daytime Emmy

edit

http://www.newsarama.com/21008-beware-the-batman-nominated-for-daytime-emmy.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.107.240.36 (talk) 20:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Beware the Batman (3 a.m.) ranked #1 in its timeslot among men 18-24 & 18-34 with 694,000

edit

http://www.crunchyroll.com/anime-news/2014/05/13/attack-on-titan-draws-almost-15-million-viewers-on-cartoon-network — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.107.240.36 (talk) 20:49, 19 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

So ... what change are you suggesting for the article?
Remember: these Talk pages are for discussing changes to the articles, not to chat about the topic.

Difference from List of Beware the Batman characters?

edit

Most of the Characters section of this article is similar or identical to List of Beware the Batman characters. So why are both needed?

Suggest either merging the two articles, or else significantly reduce the size of that section here - it already has the link to the List article for more details.

(I have also put similar comments at Talk:List of Beware the Batman characters. --Gronk Oz (talk) 16:13, 15 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Beware the Batman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beware the Batman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply