Talk:Bhagwan Das

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bhagwan Das article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Politics and Government / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

India: Uttar Pradesh / Literature / Politics Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Uttar Pradesh (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian literature workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Untitled

Copied from WP:VFD:

Bhagwan Das - possible copyright violation -- JeLuF 10:19 26 Jul 2003 (UTC)
- Original submitter claims it isn't; see talk page. --Delirium 02:58, Aug 2, 2003 (UTC)
  - I think the claim is mistaken - see the talk page. --mav 07:17, 3 Aug 2003 (UTC)
  - I reviewed the talk page and the claim of permission grant is simply not compelling. Ideally, someone should rewrite the page. Unless that is done, I favor deletion. Kat 18:25, 6 Aug 2003 (UTC)
  - The material, despite the FDL issue, is valid -- I will turn it into a stub, and maybe User:Kaysov can improve it shortly. -戴&#30505sv 20:04, Aug 7, 2003 (UTC)

I had contacted people at indiapost.com (the site from which from which i mirrorred the text.) and made sure that i am not violating any copyright laws by mirroring it. so i guess, the problem subsides.

User:kaysov

But did they give permission to release their text under terms of our license? I'm restoring the copyvio notice until we know for sure. --mav 07:05, 3 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Yeah -- Wikipedia is not a mirror Kaysov -- text here becomes "ours" -- not traceable to any patentable source. If they chose to release the text for "free use" or "fair use" -- a more common term -- then that would be acceptible. -戴&#30505sv 19:52, Aug 7, 2003 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 18 external links on Bhagwan Das. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:58, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic