Talk:Bharata (Ramayana)

Untitled

Though the IAST may seem redundant; I included it because it is still useful, in my opinion, to differentiate it from भारत/Bhārat. Khirad^talk 22:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

wow people...seriously. Bharata is such a centrally important figure in Hinduism, yet there are literally no useful citations. I respect the previous editors attempt at constructing a lucid portrayal of Bharata, but we really need more. Specifically, quotations from the ramayana, specifically mentioning aspects of his life, would be quite helpful. thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.175.8.159 (talk) 22:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Rama Returns to Ayodhya.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Rama Returns to Ayodhya.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Rama Returns to Ayodhya.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bharata (Ramayana). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100713120313/http://www.gitapress.org/ to http://www.gitapress.org

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia's WP:NPOV Guidelines

Hello, this article seems to be good however, most of it needed to be removed because it contained content not supported by listed sources or references. Content on Wikipedia needs to be sourced.

Another issue with the wording and style of the article is that it asserted doctrine as facts rather than made it clear these beliefs are held by a specific culture of religious group. Remember that Wikipedia is a place for the world to get knowledge and is not a text book written for the adherents of a specific religion. Writing the article in a neutral tone and style is really important to maintain the standard of the encyclopedia. →ὦiki-Coffee^{(talk to me!)} _{(contributions)} 09:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)