Talk:Billboard Dad

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Rewrite

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Well, I've done some rewriting on this, but it beats me why any insipid and unremarkable made-for-TV movie -- just look at the comments at IMDb! -- needs its own entry. Hoary 05:05, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Why wouldn't it have its own page??? It is a movie, and most movies have their own entry. Olsentwinluv4ever (talk) 01:39, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Tess's full name

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

About a month ago, it listed one of the main character's, Tess's, full name as "Natalie "Tess" Tyler", but this was never mentioned on the movie. I removed this, and changed it to say "Tess Tyler" (the only name mentioned in the movie), but it was changed to say "Teslina "Tess" Rose Tyler". Emily's name was listed as "Emily Danielle Tyler", which she is referred to as in the movie, but it is never said that Tess has a different first name, and her middle name isn't revealed. I believe that whoever added these names is vandalizing the page. Olsentwinluv4ever (talk) 01:39, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Finding more references

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have a number of other articles and projects underway at the moment, but I will find more references in a couple of weeks to strengthen this article. Bill Pollard (talk) 13:15, 19 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Billboard Dad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060403113739/http://billboarddad.warnerbros.com:80/index.html to http://billboarddad.warnerbros.com/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic