Talk:Birch bark manuscript

Latest comment: 5 months ago by 91.222.217.86 in topic Outer layer

Languages used

edit

Does the Russian language article say anything about the languages used? How many of the documents are written in Old Norse? -- Petri Krohn 22:25, 11 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

The Answer: There are only one document written in Old Norse. It was found in Smolensk. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.118.83.1 (talkcontribs)

Authenticity

edit

Did anybody (besides Russian archeologists who found these birchbark documents) critically assesed the authenticity of birchbark documents? Any non-RUssian sources about them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.216.45.177 (talk) 09:00, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

The authenticity of the texts is established beyond doubt.

Franklin, Simon. (1985). "Literacy and Documentation in Early Medieval Russia." Speculum 60:1 - 38.

Franklin, Simon. (2002). Writing, Society, and Culture in Early Rus, c. 950 - 1300. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Levin, Eve. (1997). "Lay Religious Identity in Medieval Russia: The Evidence of Novgorod Birch-Bark Documents." General Linguistics 35:131 - 155.

Mühle, Eduard. (1994). "Commerce and Pragmatic Literacy: The Evidence of Birchbark Documents (from the Mid-Eleventh to the First Quarter of the Thirteenth Century) on the Early Urban Development of Novgorod." In California Slavic Studies XIX: Medieval Russian Culture II, eds. Michael S. Flier and Daniel Rowland. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Thompson, M. W. (1967). Novgorod the Great. London: Evelyn, Adams, and Mackay.

Vermeer, Willem. (1995). "Towards a Thousand Birch-bark Letters." Russian Linguistics 19:109 - 123. 92.124.78.251 (talk) 21:57, 30 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

https://books.google.com/books?id=AcgfAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA246 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.90.196.227 (talk) 10:13, 3 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Outer layer

edit

Please. Correct the very beginning of the article. This is the outer layer, not inner one. I'm too familiar with birch. And therefore I think that there is simply a typo in the article. In the first sentence. outer layer, not inner one.91.222.217.86 (talk) 07:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply