Talk:Blow (film)

TUNA?

Dose anyone know what happened to Tuna? I Don't know why I'm so obsessed with him.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.29.85 (talk) 01:54, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Almost four years later, nobody has an answer? I'd curious also what happened to the guy known as "tuna." Is it accurate to assume that Tuna had a nice stash of money from selling pot with George? If Tuna stayed out of jail, Tuna made out better than George. George lost all those millions, as well as time wasted being in jail. 206.192.35.125 (talk) 17:20, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

George's future when he is released

Is there any money or real estate for George to go back to, after he is released in 2015?206.192.35.125 (talk) 17:21, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

WAY too descriptive

A plot should be summed up in a synopsis, or at least a lot more generally. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.197.180.199 (talk) 06:10, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. I added a clean-up tag for now. --Fritz S. (Talk) 12:43, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Why not delete the article? I'm starting to think that a tagged Encyclopedia is not real good, after all.... If an article doesn't meet standards, it should be deleted, period.--David Be 02:12, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

No, it should be edited to meet the standards, not deleted. --Fritz S. (Talk) 10:22, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Plot summary

I've trimmed the formerly huge plot summary from some 1900 words down to a little over 650, using an older revision [1] as a writing template. --Tony Sidaway 17:55, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Plot

The plot of this article is too detailed and needs to be more concise, so i am going to clean it up and try to make it shorter. --mjbjr1 —Preceding undated comment added 15:31, 19 November 2009 (UTC).

Fair use rationale for Image:Blow poster.jpg

Image:Blow poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Heart attack

I removed

(who later died of a cocaine related heart attack)

which also generates

It's not a leading fact abt the movie, nor (without further references) is it established knowledge abt the movie at all. Put it in his bio, if not already there, and if there is support for someone qualified having the opinion that it has to do with the movie, cite that opinion and give a ref abt the opinion being express. As it is, it violates WP:SYNTH.
--Jerzy•t 17:46, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

contested statement removed

• (Two years after the release of the film, however, Kristina Sunshine Jung did in fact visit her father. {{Fact|date=December 2006}})

Please to do return this information to the article without a citation.--BirgitteSB 16:53, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Music/Soundtrack

This article doesn't contain a Music/soundtrack section, so i am going to include that to the article. --mjbjr1 —Preceding undated comment added 15:34, 19 November 2009 (UTC). {{EducationalAssignment}}

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blow (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101129083650/http://www.weekinrewind.com/2007/09/blow-movie-review-dvd-review-2001.html to http://www.weekinrewind.com/2007/09/blow-movie-review-dvd-review-2001.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:05, 22 July 2017 (UTC)