Talk:Blue Spring Heritage Center

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 01:34, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

---

Blue Springs Heritage Center → Blue Spring Heritage Center – The name is incorrect; there is only one Blue Spring in the park, for which the property is named. Searches for "Blue Springs" do not direct to Blue Spring. This name inaccuracy can be verified by a Google search on "Blue Spring Heritage Center" Mitchel23 (talk) 01:08, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

• Support per official site. Nom could have done this, without discussion, as an uncontroversial move, I think. Deor (talk) 08:07, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blue Spring Heritage Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141022122413/http://www.arkansaspreservation.com/historic-properties/_search_nomination_popup.aspx?id=2017 to http://www.arkansaspreservation.com/historic-properties/_search_nomination_popup.aspx?id=2017

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:39, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

failed verification

"Indigenous people who lived here between 500 B.C. and A.D. 900 continued to hunt, gather, plant and trade, though planting gardens had become a more prominent activity. With over 62% of the world's food having been developed by American Indians, it is no surprise that the Indians of the Ozarks ...."

For all I know this is all true, but it is not as far as I can see supported by the sources cited. The second sentence contains the more obvious over-reach of citation: who exactly says that American Indians developed 62% of the world's food and how is this measured, e.g. is it by family, genus or species, by tonnage of food at today's consumption, by number of present day humans who consume it etc etc. ?

Although the text cannot be traced to the citations I see it matches verbatim parts of a narrative posted in the Park, which also contains the even more eye-stretching assertion that "the indigenous people of North America most likely did not, in fact, migrate here from Asia," the claim that led me to this page for enlightenment. Atconsul (talk) 21:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)