Talk:Boa constrictor
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Boa constrictor article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Renaming of the article to Boa Constrictor rather than Red-tailed Boa
editThanks to whoever was working from IP 70.109.20.219 for renaming this article to "Boa constrictor" - this is the name almost everyone uses for this snake and the other "pet-trade" name always troubled me. Good work! John Hill 23:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Where's natural history?
editThis article seems to be written entirely from the perspective of snake keepers (with its reference to zoos and snakes being "imported", presumably to the United States). Can anyone supply the straight zoological information about this snake (size, distribution, behaviour, endangered status, etc.)? Myopic Bookworm (talk) 10:35, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. Myopic Bookworm (talk) 10:56, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Does anyone think that maybe it might be a good idea to describe what "constricting" is? I read this entire article, and found no referance to the fact that the snake squeezes it's prey... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.131.130.9 (talk) 04:19, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
- That information is too general for this article. See Boidae#Feeding. --Jwinius (talk) 13:57, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Improvements to the article
editHi, I am going to be improving this article, as I feel that it is missing a lot of information on Boa constrictor. I will be increasing the information on description, behaviours, reproduction, habitat, and a few other bits. I hope that it is to everybody's standards. --XPS420 (talk) 14:35, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Assessment
editHi, I was wondering if this page can be reassessed. As it has been massively improved since the last assessment. Thanks. XPS420 (talk) 13:46, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Contradiction
editTwo sentences in the "Coloring" section (which also don't seem to belong there) seem to contradict each other, and neither are cited:
Boa constrictors also have two functional lungs, a smaller (non-functional) left and enlarged (functional) right lung to better fit their elongated shape, unlike many colubrid snakes which have completely lost the left lung.
Should they both be removed? Joshf (talk) 18:24, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Video
editHope you like the video I've added to the diet/feeding section
It's my own boa, who is currently about 7ft long, and still growing. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 14:50, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello, fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Boa constrictor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100219101658/http://www.ssscales.com/boa_care.html to http://www.ssscales.com/boa_care.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:54, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Boa Imperator is a species
edit"Boa Imperator" is no longer recognized as a subspecies of Boa Constrictor, as such, there should probably be significantly less mention of it on this page. I have been editing out the parts that I've seen that clearly mislabel the species, but there is a lot of work to be done. If you notice an incorrect naming (like B. c. Imperator) please take it down. There seem to be several images of what appear to be Central and South American boa imperator species, these should be replaced by images of Boa Constrictor or its subspecies. — Mstearnsa 20:34, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi
editBoa constrictors can be pets