Proposed merge from Mausil

edit

I have added tags proposing that Mausil be merged into this article. IMO, any text, if useful, would be better incorporated here, with a redirect created. Please post comments on the proposal here. - N (talk) 17:14, 1 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Pant Pratinidhi.jpg Nominated for Deletion==
  An image used in this article, File:Killing of Rawana Painting by Balasaheb Pant Pratinidhi.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Killing of Rawana Painting by Balasaheb Pant Pratinidhi.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:26, 11 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Abovetopsecret.com?

edit

The site linked to in Reference 2 (http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread672580/pg1http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread672580/pg1) does not seem to be an appropriate source for Wikipedia. The article itself is full of pseudo-historical fabrications that are not consistent with standard scholarly interpretations of the Atharva-Veda (though I'm no scholar of ancient Sanskrit, their "translation" of the text seems to be very loose, on the basis of more reliable translations of the Atharva-Veda I've found) Other articles on the site seem to consist mostly of conspiracy-theory type ramblings and pseudo-intellectual junk. Plus, "Incredibly Advanced Concepts in 5,000 Year Old Hindu Scripture!" doesn't really strike me as the title of a particularly reliable scholarly work. The whole thing should be removed from the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spaceinvader42 (talkcontribs) 05:04, 30 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Attributions

edit

What verse of the Mahabharata is being quoted with the segment beginning "it blazes up with terrible flames within a huge sphere of fire"? Can we have an attribution or even a link here? Thanks 162.233.200.11 (talk) 18:12, 4 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Karna Arjuna

edit

Going to need a direct reference for Karna and Arjuna firing Brahmastra at each other.Pinkfloyd11 (talk) 22:38, 20 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

New article proposed - "Weapons of power in Hindu epics"

edit

Discussion of a proposed consolidated Weapons of power in Hindu epics article is at Talk:Kurukshetra War#New article proposed - "Weapons of power in Hindu epics". --Bejnar (talk) 15:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Brahmastra is not a weapon of one particular era.

edit

Brahmastra is not a weapon of one particular era. In the main article, it is written that Brahmastra is of Mahabharata era.

In several other mythological or ancient Indian epics like puranas and Ramayana, there are mentions of Brahmastra, Brahmapaash and similar weapons.

I think the main article can be updated by some experts in Indian epics. Akhilesh1019 (talk) 18:47, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:06, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:11, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply