Talk:Braja Kishore Goswami
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Braja Kishore Goswami article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concerns about promotional content and conflict of interest
editI have serious concerns that this article may be an undisclosed paid advertisement or conflict of interest rather than a neutral, encyclopedic entry:
1. Overly positive tone: The article presents an overwhelmingly laudatory view of Braja Kishore Goswami without any critical analysis or balanced perspective.
2. Excessive irrelevant detail: The article contains an unusual level of detail about religious activities and family background, which seems promotional rather than encyclopedic for a political figure.
3. Lack of reliable sources: The references provided are minimal and do not appear to be from independent, reliable sources. Much of the content seems to be unsourced claims.
4. Promotional language: The text frequently uses laudatory language such as "great devotee," "prominent religious figure," and "social reformer" without substantiation from neutral sources.
5. Undue weight: Significant portions of the article focus on religious activities and familial connections, which appear to have little relevance to the subject's role as a politician.
6. Possible conflict of interest: The depth of insider knowledge and overwhelmingly positive portrayal suggests this may have been written by someone closely associated with the subject, without proper disclosure.
7. Non-neutral phrasing: Phrases like "It is worth mentioning" and claims of prophetic remarks are not appropriate for an encyclopedia article.
I propose that this article be tagged with
 | This article contains promotional content. |
,
 | A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. |
, and
| | The neutrality of this article is disputed. |
templates. It requires significant revision to meet Wikipedia's standards for neutrality and verifiability. Independent, reliable sources should be added, promotional language removed, and a more balanced perspective presented.
If no improvements are made, this article may need to be considered for deletion as promotional content. Input from other editors would be appreciated. Adebayochidinma28 (talk) 22:55, 26 September 2024 (UTC)