Talk:Brimstone and Treacle

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Film: British

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Television: British

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

Two items, two articles

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

The tv play and the movie are different "items". We need two articles. --Pequod76 (talk-ita.esp.eng) 01:37, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

There's barely enough information here for a Start-Class article. I don't see what benefit there would be from splitting that information. Fortdj33 (talk) 13:24, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

What's bad in a Start-Class article?

If tomorrow John Doe makes a movie about Don Quixote would you "force" to put the information about the movie in the article about Cervantes' masterpiece (with category, infobox and everything) until the information is "sufficient" to create an indipendent article?

It's not a problem of "benefits": the point is "two independent items" that are forced together. If I create two good articles about the two items in another wp, the interlinks are "stopped" because of this strange decision. The three interlinks (polish, french, italian) are about the movie. Here you have a kind of Janus... Accidentally, the title is the same. What would you do if *just* the title were different? I'm about to create an article on the Potter's play: don't you see what interlinks mess is to be created?

We have a lot of stubs and this is not a problem at all. It's normal development of the project. I'm just suggesting to be precise and clear. It's not splitting. Quite the opposite, I suggest to avoid continuing to have a roughly made botch. The birth of Wikidata suggests not having any upset about stubs...

Sorry for my English and thanks for your opinion! :-) --Pequod76 (talk-ita.esp.eng) 13:01, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Now Brimstone and Treacle (the play) has his own article on it.wiki: it:Brimstone and Treacle. The movie is it:Le due facce del male. --Pequod76 (talk-ita.esp.eng) 12:37, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic