Talk:Brooks Range

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 February 2020 and 24 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kvicich.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Vandalism!

Numerous four letter words and lewd phrases have been scattered about throughout this article.

216.74.244.66 22:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)Don Granberry.

I reverted all of the vandalism. -- Spireguy 23:10, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

MAP!!!

Why isn't there a map showing where the range runs? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.116.65.118 (talk) 03:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

• While we can now easily add a map of Alaska showing the approximate centre of the range, this will be misleading as it will not show it overlapping into Canada, thus causing some confusion. What we really need is a specialized map of the range, showing it's entire length across Alaska and into the Yukon (Canada). RedWolf (talk) 19:58, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Need a better accounting of sub-ranges

While links exist, the Romanzof and Endicott need to be mentioned. And likely others. 143.232.210.38 (talk) 21:38, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brooks Range. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111005174426/http://globaltwitcher.auderis.se/artspec_information.asp?thingid=44751 to http://globaltwitcher.auderis.se/artspec_information.asp?thingid=44751

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:08, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

February 2021: No geology section--Why?

I find it very strange that the article doesn't go into the formation of the range, the forces at work on it, the composition of the range and all the other aspects which could be seen as "geological".--Quisqualis (talk) 03:16, 20 February 2021 (UTC)