Talk:Buah Rindu/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 11:16, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Starting first read-through. More soonest. – Tim riley (talk) 11:16, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Before formally assessing this article against the GA criteria, may I offer a few gratuitous points on the prose? They are just my personal thoughts, and don't affect the question of GA status (which I shall definitely be awarding, I may say).

• Lead
  • "whilst" – I never know what this quaint word has to offer that "while" hasn't, apart from two unnecessary letters. There's another "whilst" later, too.

• Done both. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:08, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

• • "highly fixed traditional" – I think "highly fixed" needs a hyphen. And also at its occurrence in the "Style" section.

• I believe that MOS:HYPHEN suggests no hyphen (adverb, not adjective). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:08, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

• • Second para – two "highly"s in close proximity.

• Removed one. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:08, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

• Style
• "in the center" – up to this point I thought we were using UK English ("coloured", "favourites") but now US English – or other variant – pops up.

• Apologies. Now fixed. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:08, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

That's my lot. If you care to ponder and bat the ball back to me I'll do the GA formalities. – Tim riley (talk) 12:02, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks for the review! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:09, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Good grief! I've hardly had time to catch my breath. All's now done, and here's the paperwork:

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Bravo! – Tim riley (talk) 12:16, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

• Thank you! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:49, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Good grief indeed! Thanks both!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:23, 10 November 2013 (UTC)