Talk:Buldana Urban Cooperative Credit Society
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 16 June 2014. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, PaintedCarpet, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 16 June 2014. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Awaiting deletion results before copyediting |
Referencing
editIt is clear that most new editors misunderstand referencing. Vsdongre is no exception. References must be about the subject of the article. These references do not refer to Buldana at all and must be removed. Indeed I will remove them shortly
http://www.aaccu.coop/ http://www.ica-ap.coop/ http://www.ncui.coop/welcome.html http://ica.coop/en/ica-youth-network http://www.aaccu.coop/
We require sourcing from significant coverage about the entity, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42 Please. Fiddle Faddle 11:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- That's not quite true, Timtrent. References that establish the *notability* of a subject must be in-depth, reliable, and independent. However, there may be portions of the article that provide context to the subject where perfectly good sources are used that may be lacking in one of these attributes. In other words, there must be multiple references in an article that have all these attributes, but not *all* sources in an article must meet the attributes. However, your assessment is correct in that many new editors use periphial sources to try to establish notability, or to try to make the subject appear more important than than it really is, often by WP:SYNTHESIS. 78.26 (His Wiki's Voice) 11:52, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Buldana Urban Cooperative Credit Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150119014258/http://buldanaurban.in/md.html to http://buldanaurban.in/md.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)