Talk:Cabera subalba group

Latest comment: 26 days ago by Peter coxhead in topic Requested move 18 September 2024

Requested move 18 September 2024

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Author has already moved the article. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:29, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply


Cabera subalbaCabera subalba-group – We shouldn't have a group at the species name. In most cases, we should probably not even have an article for a group. Either move this article, or re-write it as a species article. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Cabera subalba is the name of a species, as well as a group. This article, however, is of the group. (It contains the Cabera subalba species as well, along with the other 5) U9 aloka (talk) 09:51, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I have moved the article to "Cabera subalba group", i.e. without the "-". This is consistent with the use in the supporting reference and other names for species groups. I've also fixed the taxobox. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply