Talk:Cal State LA station
Latest comment: 13 years ago by DanTD in topic Are two infoboxes needed?
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Are two infoboxes needed?
editAre two infoboxes with almost exactly the same information needed in the article? PeterEastern (talk) 22:15, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- No, I'll consolidate them. Infobox Station was meant to handle multiple services at once. Mackensen (talk) 18:22, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, much better. All the article needs now is a image - I am sure someone will provide one soon. PeterEastern (talk) 20:00, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- Having two of them there was only supposed to be temporary. I was kind of hoping we could merge elemnts of the standard infobox into the LACMTA one. ----DanTD (talk) 20:06, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have no view particularly about which infobox to use but do see the logic of using the LACMTA one. I will leave it to others to make any further changes. Why don't you give it a go DanTD and change it? (WP:Bold) PeterEastern (talk) 20:28, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, I tried. Some of the Metrolink parameters wouldn't show up, though, and it wouldn't accept any other owner besides LACMTA. According to the Metrolink site, the station is owned by Cal State. ----DanTD (talk) 02:48, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have no view particularly about which infobox to use but do see the logic of using the LACMTA one. I will leave it to others to make any further changes. Why don't you give it a go DanTD and change it? (WP:Bold) PeterEastern (talk) 20:28, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- Having two of them there was only supposed to be temporary. I was kind of hoping we could merge elemnts of the standard infobox into the LACMTA one. ----DanTD (talk) 20:06, 5 September 2011 (UTC)