This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
this BBC news article says a second eruption on thursday (implying the 23rd april 2015) sent ash column up to 20km, I think it is probably better described as a second paroxysm of the same eruption, but I'm not an expert. Also the article says chilean authorities (presumably OVDAS or SERNAGEOMIN) suggest total ash equals 210,000,000 cubic metres (7.4×109 cu ft) I guess that's between the two eruption/paroxysms. this blog post looks to have drawn together a reasonable amount of info and calls it a twin eruption - which also seems reasonable, I guess the term paroxysm is used for longer term eruptive sequences, what do you think (linked paroxysm to the only wiki discussion I could find on the matter) ? EdwardLane (talk) 12:23, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
